From Self-Normal-Positioning to Omni-Directional Tracking: Real-Time Surface Modeling Enabled Probe Tilt Control for Robotic Ultrasound Imaging
arXiv:2608.11409v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Ultrasound (US) provides real-time, radiation-free imaging, but the image quality depends strongly on how the probe is oriented against the patient body. Robotic US can reduce operator workload and improve acquisition consistency; however, most existing systems focus on normal positioning, where the probe is maintained perpendicular to the local surface. This constraint is inadequate for examinations like echocardiography, where obtaining a diagnostic view requires a non-normal probe angle. Consequently, a clinically useful robotic system must sense the local surface in real-time and preserve the desired probe orientation. Here, we propose an omni-directional probe-orientation control framework that integrates RGB-D perception, local-surface modeling, and task-space orientation control. The surface model fuses multi-view point clouds and provides a quadratic estimate of the local surface. A desired imaging direction is then encoded relative to the normal, enabling the probe to track arbitrary angles. The framework was evaluated through flat-surface tracking, phantom target-angle recovery, and in-vivo tracking of an expert selected view. Results show that the mean angular tracking error was 1.06 +- 0.66 deg. The system recovered a non-normal tilt angle of up to 44.39 +- 2.59 deg relative to the surface normal, and acquired the desired heart chamber view in the phantom and in-vivo experiments.
-->
[Submitted on 11 Aug 2026]
Title:From Self-Normal-Positioning to Omni-Directional Tracking: Real-Time Surface Modeling Enabled Probe Tilt Control for Robotic Ultrasound Imaging
View a PDF of the paper titled From Self-Normal-Positioning to Omni-Directional Tracking: Real-Time Surface Modeling Enabled Probe Tilt Control for Robotic Ultrasound Imaging, by Xihan Ma and 1 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Ultrasound (US) provides real-time, radiation-free imaging, but the image quality depends strongly on how the probe is oriented against the patient body. Robotic US can reduce operator workload and improve acquisition consistency; however, most existing systems focus on normal positioning, where the probe is maintained perpendicular to the local surface. This constraint is inadequate for examinations like echocardiography, where obtaining a diagnostic view requires a non-normal probe angle. Consequently, a clinically useful robotic system must sense the local surface in real-time and preserve the desired probe orientation. Here, we propose an omni-directional probe-orientation control framework that integrates RGB-D perception, local-surface modeling, and task-space orientation control. The surface model fuses multi-view point clouds and provides a quadratic estimate of the local surface. A desired imaging direction is then encoded relative to the normal, enabling the probe to track arbitrary angles. The framework was evaluated through flat-surface tracking, phantom target-angle recovery, and in-vivo tracking of an expert selected view. Results show that the mean angular tracking error was 1.06 +- 0.66 deg. The system recovered a non-normal tilt angle of up to 44.39 +- 2.59 deg relative to the surface normal, and acquired the desired heart chamber view in the phantom and in-vivo experiments.
Comments: 10 pages, 8 figures
Subjects:
Robotics (cs.RO)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.11409 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2608.11409v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.11409
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Xihan Ma [view email] [v1] Tue, 11 Aug 2026 20:16:39 UTC (10,707 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled From Self-Normal-Positioning to Omni-Directional Tracking: Real-Time Surface Modeling Enabled Probe Tilt Control for Robotic Ultrasound Imaging, by Xihan Ma and 1 other authors
View PDF
view license
Current browse context:
cs.RO
new | recent | 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Loading...
Data provided by:
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)