Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

From Proposal to Verified Effect: Praxa, an Evidence-Bound Harness for Governed AI Agent Execution

Summary

arXiv:2610.00015v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large-language-model agents can propose and execute actions, but proposal, authority, dispatch, verified external effect, and serving promotion are different claims. We present Praxa, an agent harness that represents these states explicitly through deterministic admission, brokered execution, external read-back, reconciliation, and reviewed promotion. We report four evidence lanes. First, an author-run repository-local audit at a pinned revision passed 1,027/1,027 unit tests and 89/89 Workerd tests, instrumented all 363 expected source files, and met four coverage floors; raw per-test transcripts and independent reproduction are unavailable. Second, in a provider-backed Terminal-Bench Core 0.1.1 pilot across 12 curated tasks, baseline and re…

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Stefan G. Creadore
From Proposal to Verified Effect: Praxa, an Evidence-Bound Harness for Governed AI Agent Execution
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 27 Jul 2026]

Title:From Proposal to Verified Effect: Praxa, an Evidence-Bound Harness for Governed AI Agent Execution

View a PDF of the paper titled From Proposal to Verified Effect: Praxa, an Evidence-Bound Harness for Governed AI Agent Execution, by Stefan G. Creadore

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Large-language-model agents can propose and execute actions, but proposal, authority, dispatch, verified external effect, and serving promotion are different claims. We present Praxa, an agent harness that represents these states explicitly through deterministic admission, brokered execution, external read-back, reconciliation, and reviewed promotion. We report four evidence lanes. First, an author-run repository-local audit at a pinned revision passed 1,027/1,027 unit tests and 89/89 Workerd tests, instrumented all 363 expected source files, and met four coverage floors; raw per-test transcripts and independent reproduction are unavailable. Second, in a provider-backed Terminal-Bench Core 0.1.1 pilot across 12 curated tasks, baseline and reliability-layer arms each passed 17/36 strict trials. The reliability layer used 37.49% more input and 50.73% more output tokens, so the pilot does not support superiority. Third, in a post-debug, two-order coordination-proxy development comparison, baseline and a source-authored candidate each completed 180/180 trials with equal measured accuracy, full hermetic crash recovery, and zero protected violations. The candidate used 37.11% fewer tokens, 33.84% lower estimated endpoint cost, and 11.63% fewer steps; this does not establish improved quality, latency, or production behavior. Fourth, deployed source/configuration evidence shows bounded reflection, recall accounting, memory compilation, and tool-health paths, but no production outcome lift. Praxa's supported contribution is an evidence-bound architecture that makes authority-to-effect transitions explicit and testable. Current evidence does not establish adversarial security, production safety, general specialist superiority, autonomous recursive optimization, or user benefit.

Comments: 30 pages, 8 figures. Engineering validation and descriptive pilot. Public artifacts: this https URL

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.00015 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.00015v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.00015

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Stefan Creadore [view email] [v1] Mon, 27 Jul 2026 05:57:10 UTC (191 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled From Proposal to Verified Effect: Praxa, an Evidence-Bound Harness for Governed AI Agent Execution, by Stefan G. Creadore

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.00015v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large-language-model agents can propose and execute actions, but proposal, authority, dispatch, verified external effect, and servi…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.