Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

From Natural Language Intent to Executable Control: Hierarchical Feedback-Guided LLM Planning for Multi-component Cyber-Physical Systems

Summary

arXiv:2610.22441v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) provide a convenient interface for translating natural language commands into task plans for cyber-physical systems (CPSs). However, two gaps hinder their use for real execution: generated plans may misinterpret or omit the user's intent, and even a logically plausible plan may be infeasible under component dynamics, interactions, or safety constraints. Existing LLM-based planning approaches often lack informative feedback on why a generated plan fails, providing little guidance for revising the plan accordingly. To address these challenges, we present a hierarchical feedback framework that uses different types of feedback information to guide LLMs in generating executable plans for CPSs. We prompt LLMs to genera…

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Jinglin Dai, Jiawan Wang, Ruiqi Hong, Lei Bu
From Natural Language Intent to Executable Control: Hierarchical Feedback-Guided LLM Planning for Multi-component Cyber-Physical Systems
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 15 Oct 2026]

Title:From Natural Language Intent to Executable Control: Hierarchical Feedback-Guided LLM Planning for Multi-component Cyber-Physical Systems

View a PDF of the paper titled From Natural Language Intent to Executable Control: Hierarchical Feedback-Guided LLM Planning for Multi-component Cyber-Physical Systems, by Jinglin Dai and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) provide a convenient interface for translating natural language commands into task plans for cyber-physical systems (CPSs). However, two gaps hinder their use for real execution: generated plans may misinterpret or omit the user's intent, and even a logically plausible plan may be infeasible under component dynamics, interactions, or safety constraints. Existing LLM-based planning approaches often lack informative feedback on why a generated plan fails, providing little guidance for revising the plan accordingly. To address these challenges, we present a hierarchical feedback framework that uses different types of feedback information to guide LLMs in generating executable plans for CPSs. We prompt LLMs to generate both a structured task plan and corresponding signal temporal logic (STL) constraints, and design a sound algorithm that identifies definite contradictions between them and provides feedback for revising inconsistencies. At the execution level, when control synthesis fails, we extract different types of diagnostic information, such as violated constraints and conflicting component assignments, and feed them back to guide task replanning. Experiments on seven heterogeneous multi-component CPS scenarios have shown that our framework can generate executable plans and feasible control executions that satisfy the original natural language missions with a success rate of 87.9% with GPT-5.

Comments: 20 pages, 6 figures

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.22441 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.22441v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.22441

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Jinglin Dai [view email] [v1] Thu, 15 Oct 2026 14:52:57 UTC (7,591 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled From Natural Language Intent to Executable Control: Hierarchical Feedback-Guided LLM Planning for Multi-component Cyber-Physical Systems, by Jinglin Dai and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.22441v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) provide a convenient interface for translating natural language commands into task plans for cyber-phy…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.