Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Forecast-aware Gaussian Splatting for Predictive 3D Representation in Language-Guided Pick-and-Place Manipulation

Summary

This paper introduces Forecast-GS, a framework that predicts task-completed 3D states to improve language-guided robotic manipulation. Experiments on three real-world tasks show significant improvements over baselines, with automatic selection achieving up to 23/25 success rate, but highlighting room for improvement in automatic ranking.

SourcearXiv RoboticsAuthor: Kaixin Jia, Jiacheng Xu
Forecast-aware Gaussian Splatting for Predictive 3D Representation in Language-Guided Pick-and-Place Manipulation
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.11144] Forecast-aware Gaussian Splatting for Predictive 3D Representation in Language-Guided Pick-and-Place Manipulation

[Submitted on 11 May 2026]

Title:Forecast-aware Gaussian Splatting for Predictive 3D Representation in Language-Guided Pick-and-Place Manipulation

View a PDF of the paper titled Forecast-aware Gaussian Splatting for Predictive 3D Representation in Language-Guided Pick-and-Place Manipulation, by Kaixin Jia and Jiacheng Xu

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:We introduce Forecast-aware Gaussian Splatting (Forecast-GS), a predictive 3D representation framework for language-conditioned robotic manipulation. While recent manipulation systems have made progress by grounding language instructions into robot affordances, value maps, or relational keypoint constraints, they usually reason over the current scene and do not explicitly model the task-completed state. This limitation is critical when success depends on satisfying spatial and semantic goals under partial observations, where the robot must evaluate whether a candidate action leads to a feasible task-consistent outcome.

We validate Forecast-GS on real-world pick-and-place manipulation tasks, including Cutter-to-Box, Apple-to-Bowl, and Sponge-to-Tray. For each task, we conduct 25 real-world trials under varied initial object configurations using the same robot platform and sensing setup. Forecast-GS with automatic candidate selection achieves success rates of 21/25, 23/25, and 16/25 on the three tasks, respectively, outperforming the ReKep baseline, which achieves 15/25, 19/25, and 10/25. A diagnostic human-assisted setting further improves success rates to 23/25, 24/25, and 19/25, suggesting that candidate generation is effective while automatic ranking remains imperfect. These results suggest that explicitly forecasting task-completed 3D states enables more reliable action evaluation, while the gap between automatic and human-assisted selection indicates that robust final-state ranking remains an important challenge for fully autonomous manipulation. Overall, Forecast-GS provides an interpretable bridge between language understanding, 3D perception, and robotic manipulation planning.

Subjects:

Robotics (cs.RO)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.11144 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2605.11144v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.11144

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Kaixin Jia [view email] [v1] Mon, 11 May 2026 18:48:26 UTC (1,967 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Forecast-aware Gaussian Splatting for Predictive 3D Representation in Language-Guided Pick-and-Place Manipulation, by Kaixin Jia and Jiacheng Xu

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.RO

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • Forecast-GS explicitly models the task-completed 3D scene, addressing limitations of existing methods that reason only about the current scene
  • Achieves success rates of 21/25, 23/25, and 16/25 on Cutter-to-Box, Apple-to-Bowl, and Sponge-to-Tray tasks with automatic selection
  • Human-assisted selection boosts success to 23/25, 24/25, and 19/25, showing candidate generation is effective while automatic ranking remains imperfect

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.