AI News HubLIVE
原文

Fine-Tuning Vision-Language Models for Understanding Current Damage and Scoring Priority with Quality Guard Agent

This paper proposes a method for automating bridge damage understanding and repair priority scoring using fine-tuned Vision-Language Models (VLMs). The authors fine-tune LLaVA-1.5-7B with QLoRA on up to 4,000 paired bridge damage images and inspection text records, evaluating on a fixed test set of 800 images. Results show that 2,000 training samples achieve near-optimal validation loss in 2.9 hours, with diminishing returns beyond that. A two-stage Quality Guard using a fine-tuned Swallow-8B SLM rejects low-quality VLM outputs before priority scoring.

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Fine-tuned LLaVA-1.5-7B model for automated bridge damage identification and priority scoring
  • 2,000 training samples achieve near-optimal performance; more data yields diminishing returns
  • Inference optimization reduces processing time per image by 70.2%
  • Two-stage Quality Guard effectively filters low-quality outputs

Why it matters

This matters because fine-tuned LLaVA-1.5-7B model for automated bridge damage identification and priority scoring.

Technical impact

May affect model selection, inference cost, product capability, and evaluation benchmarks.

[2605.27452] Fine-Tuning Vision-Language Models for Understanding Current Damage and Scoring Priority with Quality Guard Agent

[Submitted on 24 May 2026]

Title:Fine-Tuning Vision-Language Models for Understanding Current Damage and Scoring Priority with Quality Guard Agent

View a PDF of the paper titled Fine-Tuning Vision-Language Models for Understanding Current Damage and Scoring Priority with Quality Guard Agent, by Takato Yasuno

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Bridge inspection in Japan requires mandatory visual assessments every five years, yet qualitative damage ratings (levels a-e) assigned by different engineers exhibit significant inter-rater variability -- a critical barrier to consistent infrastructure management. The aging of skilled engineers further threatens inspection capacity. This paper presents a methodology for automating bridge damage understanding and repair priority scoring using fine-tuned Vision-Language Models (VLMs).

We fine-tune LLaVA-1.5-7B with QLoRA on up to 4,000 paired bridge damage images and inspection text records, then evaluate on a fixed test set of 800 images. The model outputs natural language descriptions identifying structural members and damage patterns, from which a rule-based scoring engine calculates a five-level repair priority index. A progressive training study (1k/2k/3k/4k samples) reveals that 2k training samples achieve near-optimal validation loss in only 2.9 hours of training; beyond 2k, validation loss improves by no more than 0.2% per doubling of training samples, exhibiting clear diminishing returns. Furthermore, semantic similarity on the held-out test set peaks at 3k (0.6909) and degrades at 4k (0.6739), indicating that quality-curated mid-scale data outperforms larger but noisier corpora. Inference optimization combining this http URL() and batch processing (batch_size=8) achieves 10.06 seconds per image -- a 70.2% reduction over the unoptimized baseline.

Our approach contributes to data governance in bridge inspection, reduces inter-rater variability, and provides AI-assisted triage to augment expert engineers in inspection workflows. Furthermore, we introduce a two-stage Quality Guard using a fine-tuned Swallow-8B SLM to reject low-quality VLM outputs before priority scoring, preventing spurious scores from damaged or unrecognised images.

Comments: 23 pages, 11 figures, 13 tables

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

ACM classes: I.5.4; I.2.7; J.2

Cite as: arXiv:2605.27452 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2605.27452v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.27452

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Takato Yasuno [view email] [v1] Sun, 24 May 2026 21:11:50 UTC (1,479 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Fine-Tuning Vision-Language Models for Understanding Current Damage and Scoring Priority with Quality Guard Agent, by Takato Yasuno

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)