Fine-Tuning Vision-Language Models for Understanding Current Damage and Scoring Priority with Quality Guard Agent
This paper proposes a method for automating bridge damage understanding and repair priority scoring using fine-tuned Vision-Language Models (VLMs). The authors fine-tune LLaVA-1.5-7B with QLoRA on up to 4,000 paired bridge damage images and inspection text records, evaluating on a fixed test set of 800 images. Results show that 2,000 training samples achieve near-optimal validation loss in 2.9 hours, with diminishing returns beyond that. A two-stage Quality Guard using a fine-tuned Swallow-8B SLM rejects low-quality VLM outputs before priority scoring.
Article intelligence
Key points
- Fine-tuned LLaVA-1.5-7B model for automated bridge damage identification and priority scoring
- 2,000 training samples achieve near-optimal performance; more data yields diminishing returns
- Inference optimization reduces processing time per image by 70.2%
- Two-stage Quality Guard effectively filters low-quality outputs
Why it matters
This matters because fine-tuned LLaVA-1.5-7B model for automated bridge damage identification and priority scoring.
Technical impact
May affect model selection, inference cost, product capability, and evaluation benchmarks.
[2605.27452] Fine-Tuning Vision-Language Models for Understanding Current Damage and Scoring Priority with Quality Guard Agent
[Submitted on 24 May 2026]
Title:Fine-Tuning Vision-Language Models for Understanding Current Damage and Scoring Priority with Quality Guard Agent
View a PDF of the paper titled Fine-Tuning Vision-Language Models for Understanding Current Damage and Scoring Priority with Quality Guard Agent, by Takato Yasuno
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Bridge inspection in Japan requires mandatory visual assessments every five years, yet qualitative damage ratings (levels a-e) assigned by different engineers exhibit significant inter-rater variability -- a critical barrier to consistent infrastructure management. The aging of skilled engineers further threatens inspection capacity. This paper presents a methodology for automating bridge damage understanding and repair priority scoring using fine-tuned Vision-Language Models (VLMs).
We fine-tune LLaVA-1.5-7B with QLoRA on up to 4,000 paired bridge damage images and inspection text records, then evaluate on a fixed test set of 800 images. The model outputs natural language descriptions identifying structural members and damage patterns, from which a rule-based scoring engine calculates a five-level repair priority index. A progressive training study (1k/2k/3k/4k samples) reveals that 2k training samples achieve near-optimal validation loss in only 2.9 hours of training; beyond 2k, validation loss improves by no more than 0.2% per doubling of training samples, exhibiting clear diminishing returns. Furthermore, semantic similarity on the held-out test set peaks at 3k (0.6909) and degrades at 4k (0.6739), indicating that quality-curated mid-scale data outperforms larger but noisier corpora. Inference optimization combining this http URL() and batch processing (batch_size=8) achieves 10.06 seconds per image -- a 70.2% reduction over the unoptimized baseline.
Our approach contributes to data governance in bridge inspection, reduces inter-rater variability, and provides AI-assisted triage to augment expert engineers in inspection workflows. Furthermore, we introduce a two-stage Quality Guard using a fine-tuned Swallow-8B SLM to reject low-quality VLM outputs before priority scoring, preventing spurious scores from damaged or unrecognised images.
Comments: 23 pages, 11 figures, 13 tables
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
ACM classes: I.5.4; I.2.7; J.2
Cite as: arXiv:2605.27452 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2605.27452v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.27452
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Takato Yasuno [view email] [v1] Sun, 24 May 2026 21:11:50 UTC (1,479 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Fine-Tuning Vision-Language Models for Understanding Current Damage and Scoring Priority with Quality Guard Agent, by Takato Yasuno
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CV
new | recent | 2026-05
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Loading...
Data provided by:
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)