AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Federated Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Roles, Architectures, Evaluation, and Open Challenges

Federated Learning (FL) enables privacy-preserving collaborative training across distributed data, but lacks model transparency. Explainable AI (XAI) addresses opacity. Their intersection, Federated Explainable AI (FedXAI), is systematically reviewed in this survey, highlighting explainability's shift from post-hoc tool to integral FL component. A taxonomy classifies methods by role, model type, scope, integration level, FL settings, and data heterogeneity. Evaluation practices lack standardized benchmarks. Key challenges include non-IID data, security threats, communication efficiency, continual learning, and domain knowledge integration.

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Masoume Gholizade, Fabrizio Ruffini, Pietro Ducange, Francesco Marcelloni

-->

[Submitted on 15 Jun 2026]

Title:Federated Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Roles, Architectures, Evaluation, and Open Challenges

View a PDF of the paper titled Federated Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Roles, Architectures, Evaluation, and Open Challenges, by Masoume Gholizade and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a key paradigm for privacy-preserving collaborative model training across distributed and heterogeneous data sources. By keeping raw data local, FL addresses data confidentiality concerns, yet it does not resolve the opacity of modern machine learning models. In parallel, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has gained attention for improving transparency, trust, and accountability, particularly in high-stakes domains. Their intersection has given rise to Federated Explainable Artificial Intelligence (FedXAI) paradigm, which aims to jointly satisfy privacy and explainability requirements. This survey provides a systematic review of FedXAI, highlighting the transition of explainability from a post-hoc tool to an integral component of the FL lifecycle. We show how explainability supports aggregation, personalization, robustness, coordination, and system-level decision making. To organize the literature, we introduce a taxonomy that classifies FedXAI methods by the role of explainability, model and explainer types, explanation scope, integration level, FL settings, and data heterogeneity. We review approaches ranging from model-agnostic explanations to interpretable federated models and explainability-aware aggregation mechanisms. We also examine evaluation practices and discuss the lack of standardized benchmarks and metrics for measuring explanation quality, stability, privacy leakage, and computational overhead. Finally, we identify key challenges, including explainability under non-IID data, explanation-centric security threats, communication-efficient XAI, continual FedXAI, and the integration of domain knowledge and regulatory constraints. By consolidating existing work and identifying key gaps, this survey serves as a reference framework for designing trustworthy, transparent, and privacy-preserving federated AI systems.

Comments: 68 pages, 4 figures

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

MSC classes: 68T05, 68T07

ACM classes: I.2.6; I.2.11

Cite as: arXiv:2607.13045 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2607.13045v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.13045

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Journal reference: Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 331, 2026, 133183

Related DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2026.133183

DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Masoume Gholizade [view email] [v1] Mon, 15 Jun 2026 21:02:31 UTC (474 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Federated Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Roles, Architectures, Evaluation, and Open Challenges, by Masoume Gholizade and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)