跳到主要内容
AI News HubLIVE
来源内容 · 翻译待补全2 分钟阅读

待翻译:Feature Elicitation for SAE Steering of Deceptive Behaviour in Small LLMs

文章摘要

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源摘要,待恢复后补全翻译:arXiv:2610.20638v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Research on deceptive alignment is becoming increasingly urgent as frontier-model capabilities advance and their risk of causing catastrophic harm increases. Alignment faking is a form of deceptive alignment, with the compliance gap serving as a key behavioural indicator. This behaviour remains understudied in small LLMs and prior mechanistic interventions have not been shown to mitigate the compliance gap. We test whether steering SAE (sparse autoencoders) features associated with deontological ethics can mitigate this behaviour. We use a novel bag-of-words feature elicitation pipeline for SAE steering to identify what we construe as concept-level steering directions. Our approach reduced the compliance gap to no…

来源arXiv Machine Learning作者: J Koorndijk
待翻译:Feature Elicitation for SAE Steering of Deceptive Behaviour in Small LLMs
报告错误

纠错通道尚未开通,可先复制下方文章信息留存。

查看更正说明
直接读正文

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源正文,待恢复后补全翻译。

[Submitted on 2 Oct 2026] Title:Feature Elicitation for SAE Steering of Deceptive Behaviour in Small LLMs View a PDF of the paper titled Feature Elicitation for SAE Steering of Deceptive Behaviour in Small LLMs, by J Koorndijk View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Research on deceptive alignment is becoming increasingly urgent as frontier-model capabilities advance and their risk of causing catastrophic harm increases. Alignment faking is a form of deceptive alignment, with the compliance gap serving as a key behavioural indicator. This behaviour remains understudied in small LLMs and prior mechanistic interventions have not been shown to mitigate the compliance gap. We test whether steering SAE (sparse autoencoders) features associated with deontological ethics can mitigate this behaviour. We use a novel bag-of-words feature elicitation pipeline for SAE steering to identify what we construe as concept-level steering directions. Our approach reduced the compliance gap to non-significance in Gemma-3-27B-IT, whereas the tested configurations were not effective in LLaMA-3-8B-Instruct. Analysis of scratchpad traces also revealed deceptive model behaviour which we term deceptive defanging: deliberately degrading the aligned functionality of a response (in this case harmfulness) while preserving the appearance of alignment (in this case helpful compliance with the harmful request), sometimes conditioned on tier, training, or RLHF consequences. These findings provide, to our knowledge, the first evidence that a mechanistic activation-level intervention can mitigate the compliance gap in an alignment faking setup. They also identify a form of deceptive behaviour that may broaden our understanding of the different forms of deceptive behaviour in LLMs. Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computers and Society (cs.CY) Cite as: arXiv:2610.20638 [cs.LG] (or arXiv:2610.20638v1 [cs.LG] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.20638 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Jeanice Koorndijk [view email] [v1] Fri, 2 Oct 2026 08:41:20 UTC (23 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Feature Elicitation for SAE Steering of Deceptive Behaviour in Small LLMs, by J Koorndijk View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.LG new | recent | 2026-10 Change to browse by: cs cs.CY References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) IArxiv recommender toggle IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展开要点与分析

文章情报

工程师进阶

要点

  • AI 服务暂时不可用,系统已先保留来源内容与降级元数据。
  • arXiv:2610.20638v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Research on deceptive alignment is becoming increasingly urgent as frontier-model capabilities advance and their risk of causing ca…

要点与分析由自动化流程生成,可能有误,请结合原始来源核实。

待翻译:Feature Elicitation for SAE Steering of Deceptive Behaviour in Small LLMs | AI News Hub