本文にスキップ
AI News HubLIVE
原典の内容 · 翻訳・分析待ち2 分で読了

翻訳待ち:Feature Elicitation for SAE Steering of Deceptive Behaviour in Small LLMs

記事の要約

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。ソース概要:arXiv:2610.20638v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Research on deceptive alignment is becoming increasingly urgent as frontier-model capabilities advance and their risk of causing catastrophic harm increases. Alignment faking is a form of deceptive alignment, with the compliance gap serving as a key behavioural indicator. This behaviour remains understudied in small LLMs and prior mechanistic interventions have not been shown to mitigate the compliance gap. We test whether steering SAE (sparse autoencoders) features associated with deontological ethics can mitigate this behaviour. We use a novel bag-of-words feature elicitation pipeline for SAE steering to identify what we construe as concept-level steering directions. Our approach reduced the complian…

ソースarXiv Machine Learning著者: J Koorndijk
翻訳待ち:Feature Elicitation for SAE Steering of Deceptive Behaviour in Small LLMs
誤りを報告

訂正窓口はまだ利用できません。記事情報をコピーして保存できます。

訂正案内
本文へ

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。

[Submitted on 2 Oct 2026] Title:Feature Elicitation for SAE Steering of Deceptive Behaviour in Small LLMs View a PDF of the paper titled Feature Elicitation for SAE Steering of Deceptive Behaviour in Small LLMs, by J Koorndijk View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Research on deceptive alignment is becoming increasingly urgent as frontier-model capabilities advance and their risk of causing catastrophic harm increases. Alignment faking is a form of deceptive alignment, with the compliance gap serving as a key behavioural indicator. This behaviour remains understudied in small LLMs and prior mechanistic interventions have not been shown to mitigate the compliance gap. We test whether steering SAE (sparse autoencoders) features associated with deontological ethics can mitigate this behaviour. We use a novel bag-of-words feature elicitation pipeline for SAE steering to identify what we construe as concept-level steering directions. Our approach reduced the compliance gap to non-significance in Gemma-3-27B-IT, whereas the tested configurations were not effective in LLaMA-3-8B-Instruct. Analysis of scratchpad traces also revealed deceptive model behaviour which we term deceptive defanging: deliberately degrading the aligned functionality of a response (in this case harmfulness) while preserving the appearance of alignment (in this case helpful compliance with the harmful request), sometimes conditioned on tier, training, or RLHF consequences. These findings provide, to our knowledge, the first evidence that a mechanistic activation-level intervention can mitigate the compliance gap in an alignment faking setup. They also identify a form of deceptive behaviour that may broaden our understanding of the different forms of deceptive behaviour in LLMs. Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computers and Society (cs.CY) Cite as: arXiv:2610.20638 [cs.LG] (or arXiv:2610.20638v1 [cs.LG] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.20638 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Jeanice Koorndijk [view email] [v1] Fri, 2 Oct 2026 08:41:20 UTC (23 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Feature Elicitation for SAE Steering of Deceptive Behaviour in Small LLMs, by J Koorndijk View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.LG new | recent | 2026-10 Change to browse by: cs cs.CY References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) IArxiv recommender toggle IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

要点と分析を開く

記事インテリジェンス

エンジニア上級

要点

  • AI 生成が一時的に利用できないため、ソース内容とフォールバックメタデータを保存しました。
  • arXiv:2610.20638v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Research on deceptive alignment is becoming increasingly urgent as frontier-model capabilities advance and their risk of causing ca…

要点と分析は自動生成され、誤りを含む場合があります。原典をご確認ください。