Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Feature Competition and Its Representational Origins in Vision Language Models: Evidence from the Stroop Paradigm

Summary

arXiv:2610.12650v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When you ask a vision-language model (VLM) a question with an image, it answers your question based on the image. But to act means to choose: saying one thing means choosing to respond not say another. This becomes an issue when the image contains multiple features that equally relate to the question at hand: how would VLMs choose to respond? This problem is precisely studied by the classical Stroop task in psychology: among a set of deliberately designed images whose text and color conflicts (e.g., \textcolor{blue}{RED}), participants are instructed to report the color. We adapt this psychological paradigm to a benchmark and prompted a range of contrastive and generative VLMs on their behavior. Across models, we observe a persistent bias to…

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Nurb\"uke Teker, Rui Xiao, Zeynep Akata, Shuchen Wu
Feature Competition and Its Representational Origins in Vision Language Models: Evidence from the Stroop Paradigm
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 8 Oct 2026]

Title:Feature Competition and Its Representational Origins in Vision Language Models: Evidence from the Stroop Paradigm

View a PDF of the paper titled Feature Competition and Its Representational Origins in Vision Language Models: Evidence from the Stroop Paradigm, by Nurb\"uke Teker and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:When you ask a vision-language model (VLM) a question with an image, it answers your question based on the image. But to act means to choose: saying one thing means choosing to respond not say another. This becomes an issue when the image contains multiple features that equally relate to the question at hand: how would VLMs choose to respond? This problem is precisely studied by the classical Stroop task in psychology: among a set of deliberately designed images whose text and color conflicts (e.g., \textcolor{blue}{RED}), participants are instructed to report the color. We adapt this psychological paradigm to a benchmark and prompted a range of contrastive and generative VLMs on their behavior. Across models, we observe a persistent bias toward the feature of text in Stroop images: when text and color disagree, models preferentially generate responses centered to the text rather than color. We then opened the black box and examined the source of this bias and why certain features influences the model's behavior more than others. In the embedding space, we found that textual cues are represented more strongly and separably than color cues. This representational asymmetry predicts intervention success: steering models toward text-related directions is substantially easier than steering them toward color-related directions. Using a classical psychological paradigm, we demonstrate, at both behavioral and representational levels, that distinct features within the same image can exert unequal influence on VLM behavior. Our findings suggest that VLMs assign different degrees of saliency to different features within the same image, highlighting the need to understand how cue-specific saliency shapes their performance in widely used downstream applications.

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.12650 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2610.12650v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.12650

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Shuchen Wu [view email] [v1] Thu, 8 Oct 2026 19:13:43 UTC (5,267 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Feature Competition and Its Representational Origins in Vision Language Models: Evidence from the Stroop Paradigm, by Nurb\"uke Teker and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.12650v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When you ask a vision-language model (VLM) a question with an image, it answers your question based on the image. But to act means…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.

Feature Competition and Its Representational Origins in Vision Language Models: Evidence from the Stroop Paradigm | AI News Hub