本文にスキップ
AI News HubLIVE
原典の内容 · 翻訳・分析待ち2 分で読了

翻訳待ち:Expert-Guided Rubrics as Dense Reward Signals for Reinforcement Learning in Non-Verifiable Domains

記事の要約

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。ソース概要:arXiv:2610.26932v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents in non-verifiable domains such as financial services, where they must interpret user intent, rewrite queries, and retrieve information under domain-specific constraints. Although reinforcement learning (RL) can train such agents from the consequences of their actions, recent successes largely rely on verifiable tasks with automatically computed binary rewards. In non-verifiable retrieval tasks, assessing query quality requires scarce subject-matter expert (SME) judgment that is inherently graded rather than binary. With Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), sparse rewards yield no useful learning signal when all sampled ou…

ソースarXiv Machine Learning著者: Ashish Bansal, Hossam Amer, Keerat Kaur Guliani, Parinita Edke, Lesley Matheson, Leizer Teran
翻訳待ち:Expert-Guided Rubrics as Dense Reward Signals for Reinforcement Learning in Non-Verifiable Domains
誤りを報告

訂正窓口はまだ利用できません。記事情報をコピーして保存できます。

訂正案内
本文へ

AI サービスが一時的に利用できないため、復旧後に翻訳を補完します。

[Submitted on 17 Oct 2026] Title:Expert-Guided Rubrics as Dense Reward Signals for Reinforcement Learning in Non-Verifiable Domains View a PDF of the paper titled Expert-Guided Rubrics as Dense Reward Signals for Reinforcement Learning in Non-Verifiable Domains, by Ashish Bansal and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents in non-verifiable domains such as financial services, where they must interpret user intent, rewrite queries, and retrieve information under domain-specific constraints. Although reinforcement learning (RL) can train such agents from the consequences of their actions, recent successes largely rely on verifiable tasks with automatically computed binary rewards. In non-verifiable retrieval tasks, assessing query quality requires scarce subject-matter expert (SME) judgment that is inherently graded rather than binary. With Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), sparse rewards yield no useful learning signal when all sampled outputs within a group receive the same outcome, causing optimization to stall. We introduce a method that converts a small, fixed investment of SME judgment into a dense reward and combines it with retrieval-based metrics to form a hybrid, GRPO-compatible training signal. Experiments show improvements of up to 6\% in Recall@3 and 6.7\% in MRR@3 compared with sparse-reward baselines. Comments: 11 pages, 4 figures, RL4LLM-Agents workshop ICAIF ACM Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Information Retrieval (cs.IR) Cite as: arXiv:2610.26932 [cs.LG] (or arXiv:2610.26932v1 [cs.LG] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.26932 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Ashish Bansal [view email] [v1] Sat, 17 Oct 2026 19:01:11 UTC (625 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Expert-Guided Rubrics as Dense Reward Signals for Reinforcement Learning in Non-Verifiable Domains, by Ashish Bansal and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.LG new | recent | 2026-10 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.IR References & Citations SciX Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) IArxiv recommender toggle IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

要点と分析を開く

記事インテリジェンス

エンジニア上級

要点

  • AI 生成が一時的に利用できないため、ソース内容とフォールバックメタデータを保存しました。
  • arXiv:2610.26932v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents in non-verifiable domains such as financial services, w…

要点と分析は自動生成され、誤りを含む場合があります。原典をご確認ください。