Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Evidence-Order Calibration for Selective Visual Reasoning under Progressive Loss of Question-Critical Evidence

Summary

arXiv:2609.09184v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language model (VLM) confidence may change in aggregate when visual evidence is degraded while remaining structurally inconsistent within individual examples. We study answer-level reliability along five-step, question-conditioned evidence-loss trajectories. Using a frozen Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct model, we construct 176 accepted GQA-derived trajectories (880 masking conditions) by progressively masking scene-graph-localized question-critical regions. Native sequence confidence has an evidence monotonicity violation rate (EMVR) of 0.436, and 92.0% of trajectories contain at least one adjacent violation. A matched non-critical-region control shows that full critical masking reduces accuracy by 28.2 percentage points, compared with 0.6 po…

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Muhamathu Ameer Ali Aacaas Muhamath
Evidence-Order Calibration for Selective Visual Reasoning under Progressive Loss of Question-Critical Evidence
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 29 Aug 2026]

Title:Evidence-Order Calibration for Selective Visual Reasoning under Progressive Loss of Question-Critical Evidence

View a PDF of the paper titled Evidence-Order Calibration for Selective Visual Reasoning under Progressive Loss of Question-Critical Evidence, by Muhamathu Ameer Ali Aacaas Muhamath

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Vision-language model (VLM) confidence may change in aggregate when visual evidence is degraded while remaining structurally inconsistent within individual examples. We study answer-level reliability along five-step, question-conditioned evidence-loss trajectories. Using a frozen Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct model, we construct 176 accepted GQA-derived trajectories (880 masking conditions) by progressively masking scene-graph-localized question-critical regions. Native sequence confidence has an evidence monotonicity violation rate (EMVR) of 0.436, and 92.0% of trajectories contain at least one adjacent violation. A matched non-critical-region control shows that full critical masking reduces accuracy by 28.2 percentage points, compared with 0.6 points for equally sized non-critical masks; the paired difference is 27.6 points (95% CI [20.0, 34.7]). We train a lightweight post-hoc reliability head on frozen hidden states, sequence confidence, and entropy. Adding evidence-order supervision to binary cross-entropy (BCE) reduces masking EMVR from 0.330 to 0.303 (paired difference -0.027, 95% CI [-0.044, -0.010]). The same mask-trained objective reduces EMVR from 0.449 to 0.402 on held-out question IDs under unseen local Gaussian blur (difference -0.0468, 95% CI [-0.0739, -0.0199]). AUROC, Brier, and AURC differences between the two learned heads are statistically inconclusive, and native confidence remains stronger for selective-risk ranking. The results separate evidence-order consistency from conventional correctness discrimination rather than establishing generic confidence superiority.

Comments: 8 pages, 6 figures, 4 tables. Code and supplementary materials: this https URL

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.09184 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2609.09184v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.09184

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Aacaas Muhamath [view email] [v1] Sat, 29 Aug 2026 20:29:03 UTC (1,472 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Evidence-Order Calibration for Selective Visual Reasoning under Progressive Loss of Question-Critical Evidence, by Muhamathu Ameer Ali Aacaas Muhamath

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.09184v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language model (VLM) confidence may change in aggregate when visual evidence is degraded while remaining structurally incons…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.