2026-08-18 04:00 UTCOriginal source2 min readUpdated: 2026-08-18 08:48 UTC

Evidence of Absence: Cross-Modal Abductive Risk Perception to Sustain World Models When Vision Fails

arXiv:2608.14952v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A structured world-state (entities, relations, context, and predictive cues) is designed to preserve prediction-critical content when perception degrades, but it presumes observations to populate it; when the primary visual modality is occluded or degraded, those observations may be missing. We address how to sustain the world model from a complementary modality by treating the absence of expected co-evidence as evidence of a hidden cause. The abductive framework is modality-agnostic; this article instantiates it acoustically. A microphone-array front-end estimates the bearing of engine and tire sources and extracts approach-rate evidence (Doppler when a stable tone exists, a broadband looming readout otherwise); the event "signature present, visual co-evidence absent" then triggers abductive inference of a hidden road user, emitting a calibrated risk advisory rather than a control command. Recoverability of the hidden state is analyzed as an identifiability question separating shared from modality-unique information, and cueing is cast as Neyman-Pearson detection under an explicit false-alarm budget. On real occluded-approach recordings at blind junctions, the method warns a mean 1.7 seconds before line-of-sight entry, matches the sustained-window variant of the published acoustic baseline's detection rate with 42% fewer false alarms, localizes to 3.4 degrees median once in view, is well calibrated (expected calibration error 0.034), and keeps hazard awareness above 0.87 under staged vision degradation that collapses a vision-only channel to 0.03. We also measure the method's limits: calibration transfers to an unseen junction almost losslessly, the signature classifier does not, and moving-ego noise is the binding deployment constraint.

SourcearXiv RoboticsAuthor: Cong Xu, Ravi Sankar

-->

[Submitted on 15 Aug 2026]

Title:Evidence of Absence: Cross-Modal Abductive Risk Perception to Sustain World Models When Vision Fails

View a PDF of the paper titled Evidence of Absence: Cross-Modal Abductive Risk Perception to Sustain World Models When Vision Fails, by Cong Xu and 1 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:A structured world-state (entities, relations, context, and predictive cues) is designed to preserve prediction-critical content when perception degrades, but it presumes observations to populate it; when the primary visual modality is occluded or degraded, those observations may be missing. We address how to sustain the world model from a complementary modality by treating the absence of expected co-evidence as evidence of a hidden cause. The abductive framework is modality-agnostic; this article instantiates it acoustically. A microphone-array front-end estimates the bearing of engine and tire sources and extracts approach-rate evidence (Doppler when a stable tone exists, a broadband looming readout otherwise); the event "signature present, visual co-evidence absent" then triggers abductive inference of a hidden road user, emitting a calibrated risk advisory rather than a control command. Recoverability of the hidden state is analyzed as an identifiability question separating shared from modality-unique information, and cueing is cast as Neyman-Pearson detection under an explicit false-alarm budget. On real occluded-approach recordings at blind junctions, the method warns a mean 1.7 seconds before line-of-sight entry, matches the sustained-window variant of the published acoustic baseline's detection rate with 42% fewer false alarms, localizes to 3.4 degrees median once in view, is well calibrated (expected calibration error 0.034), and keeps hazard awareness above 0.87 under staged vision degradation that collapses a vision-only channel to 0.03. We also measure the method's limits: calibration transfers to an unseen junction almost losslessly, the signature classifier does not, and moving-ego noise is the binding deployment constraint.

Comments: 7 pages, 3 figures. Working draft prepared for journal submission

Subjects:

Robotics (cs.RO); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Signal Processing (eess.SP)

Cite as: arXiv:2608.14952 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2608.14952v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.14952

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Cong Xu [view email] [v1] Sat, 15 Aug 2026 00:38:17 UTC (944 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Evidence of Absence: Cross-Modal Abductive Risk Perception to Sustain World Models When Vision Fails, by Cong Xu and 1 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.RO

new | recent | 2026-08

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CV eess eess.SP

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)