Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Evaluating Time Series Foundation Models for Electricity Price Forecasting: Contamination Risk, Distributional Shifts, and Covariate Dependence

Summary

This study proposes a two-dataset benchmarking framework to fairly evaluate time series foundation models (TSFMs) for electricity price forecasting. It finds TSFMs competitive but dependent on covariate support, not always surpassing domain-specific methods. Ensembles show promise, capturing complementary information.

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Zhenghua Pan, Ahmed Aziz Ezzat
Evaluating Time Series Foundation Models for Electricity Price Forecasting: Contamination Risk, Distributional Shifts, and Covariate Dependence
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 2 Jul 2026]

Title:Evaluating Time Series Foundation Models for Electricity Price Forecasting: Contamination Risk, Distributional Shifts, and Covariate Dependence

View a PDF of the paper titled Evaluating Time Series Foundation Models for Electricity Price Forecasting: Contamination Risk, Distributional Shifts, and Covariate Dependence, by Zhenghua Pan and 1 other authors

View PDF

Abstract:Time series foundation models (TSFMs) have shown strong zero-shot forecasting performance, but their generalization in covariate-driven, non-stationary settings is underexplored. Electricity price forecasting (EPF) presents a challenging testbed due to complex temporal dependencies, distributional shifts, and strong reliance on structural and contextual information. We propose a two-dataset-benchmarking framework for EPF to mitigate contamination risk and enable fair evaluation of TSFMs. We examine key aspects of EPF including point and probabilistic forecasting performance, tail behavior, price spikes, and comparisons against domain-specific methods. We find that TSFMs are highly competitive and often outperform general-purpose baselines. Yet, their performance depends critically on covariate support, and they do not consistently surpass domain-specific methods tailored to EPF. Interestingly, simple ensembles of TSFMs and domain-specific methods appear to have significant potential, suggesting that the two approaches capture complementary predictive information.

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Systems and Control (eess.SY)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.02623 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2607.02623v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.02623

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Journal reference: ICML 2026 Foundation Models for Structured Data Workshop, 43rd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), Seoul, South Korea

Submission history

From: Ahmed Aziz Ezzat [view email] [v1] Thu, 2 Jul 2026 11:43:22 UTC (2,185 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Evaluating Time Series Foundation Models for Electricity Price Forecasting: Contamination Risk, Distributional Shifts, and Covariate Dependence, by Zhenghua Pan and 1 other authors

View PDF

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs cs.SY eess eess.SY

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • Proposes a two-dataset benchmark to mitigate contamination risk.
  • TSFMs are highly competitive but depend critically on covariate support.
  • Simple ensembles of TSFMs and domain-specific methods show significant potential.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.