Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Evaluating Multi-Dimensional Generalization of Large Language Models in Temporal Extraction Tasks

Summary

arXiv:2610.02549v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Time and event expression extraction are fundamental temporal reasoning tasks, but the problem remains difficult due to annotation ambiguity, domain sensitivity, and unstable model behavior. Existing evaluations focus on in-domain performance, offering limited insight into reliability under distribution shifts. We evaluate multiple model configurations across families, architectures, and reasoning strategies over four dimensions of generalization, examining transfer from base performance, cross-dimensional correlations, and the effects of scale, architecture, and prompting. This provides a systematic study of how prompted LLMs generalize in time and event expression extraction tasks. We find that strong base-task performance generally predic…

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Fahmid Shahriar Iqbal, Ritam Dutt, Soumitra Das, Arnav Verma, Sagnik Ray Choudhury
Evaluating Multi-Dimensional Generalization of Large Language Models in Temporal Extraction Tasks
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 1 Oct 2026]

Title:Evaluating Multi-Dimensional Generalization of Large Language Models in Temporal Extraction Tasks

View a PDF of the paper titled Evaluating Multi-Dimensional Generalization of Large Language Models in Temporal Extraction Tasks, by Fahmid Shahriar Iqbal and 4 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Time and event expression extraction are fundamental temporal reasoning tasks, but the problem remains difficult due to annotation ambiguity, domain sensitivity, and unstable model behavior. Existing evaluations focus on in-domain performance, offering limited insight into reliability under distribution shifts. We evaluate multiple model configurations across families, architectures, and reasoning strategies over four dimensions of generalization, examining transfer from base performance, cross-dimensional correlations, and the effects of scale, architecture, and prompting. This provides a systematic study of how prompted LLMs generalize in time and event expression extraction tasks. We find that strong base-task performance generally predicts better generalization. However, this relationship weakens under substantial distribution shifts. Inductive prompting performs most consistently across domain shift, adversarial perturbations, compositionality, and length increase, while gains from scale, architecture, and deductive and abductive prompting strategies are uneven and dimension-specific. We conclude that LLM generalization in temporal extraction tasks cannot be predicted from any single dimension alone and cannot be reliably inferred from in-domain or single-dimension evaluations, highlighting the need for reasoning strategies that generalize across dimensions.

Comments: accepted AACL-IJCNLP 2026 Findings

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.02549 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.02549v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.02549

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Fahmid Shahriar Iqbal [view email] [v1] Thu, 1 Oct 2026 22:35:22 UTC (1,728 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Evaluating Multi-Dimensional Generalization of Large Language Models in Temporal Extraction Tasks, by Fahmid Shahriar Iqbal and 4 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.02549v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Time and event expression extraction are fundamental temporal reasoning tasks, but the problem remains difficult due to annotation…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.