Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Evaluating Large Language Models for Multilingual Abstractive Summarization: A Comprehensive Study of English and Bengali

Summary

arXiv:2610.19003v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Abstractive summarization remains challenging across languages, where linguistic quality and factual consistency may diverge, particularly in low-resource settings. We present a standardized zero-shot benchmark of eight closed-source and open-weight LLMs on size-matched English and Bengali XL-Sum test sets. Our evaluation combines lexical and semantic metrics with reference-free factuality verification and multidimensional LLM-as-a-Judge assessment, providing a comprehensive analysis of both surface-level quality and factual reliability in multilingual summarization. Results reveal substantial cross-lingual variation: GPT-5.6 Luna leads several English lexical metrics but does not maintain the same advantage in Bengali, where LLaMA 3.3 70B a…

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Khan Mahi Al Atahar, Nazifa Tasneem, Ajwad Abrar
Evaluating Large Language Models for Multilingual Abstractive Summarization: A Comprehensive Study of English and Bengali
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 13 Oct 2026]

Title:Evaluating Large Language Models for Multilingual Abstractive Summarization: A Comprehensive Study of English and Bengali

View a PDF of the paper titled Evaluating Large Language Models for Multilingual Abstractive Summarization: A Comprehensive Study of English and Bengali, by Khan Mahi Al Atahar and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Abstractive summarization remains challenging across languages, where linguistic quality and factual consistency may diverge, particularly in low-resource settings. We present a standardized zero-shot benchmark of eight closed-source and open-weight LLMs on size-matched English and Bengali XL-Sum test sets. Our evaluation combines lexical and semantic metrics with reference-free factuality verification and multidimensional LLM-as-a-Judge assessment, providing a comprehensive analysis of both surface-level quality and factual reliability in multilingual summarization. Results reveal substantial cross-lingual variation: GPT-5.6 Luna leads several English lexical metrics but does not maintain the same advantage in Bengali, where LLaMA 3.3 70B achieves the highest ROUGE and BLEU scores. Gemini 2.5 Flash obtains the highest observed Bengali factuality score. Furthermore, evaluation methods produce different model rankings, highlighting the limitations of relying on a single metric for multilingual summarization assessment. These findings demonstrate that strong English summarization performance does not necessarily transfer to Bengali and emphasize the need for comprehensive evaluation frameworks for low-resource languages.

Comments: Accepted in MCT4SD 2026 (Manila, Philippines)

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.19003 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.19003v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.19003

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Nazifa Tasneem [view email] [v1] Tue, 13 Oct 2026 18:05:03 UTC (11 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Evaluating Large Language Models for Multilingual Abstractive Summarization: A Comprehensive Study of English and Bengali, by Khan Mahi Al Atahar and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.19003v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Abstractive summarization remains challenging across languages, where linguistic quality and factual consistency may diverge, parti…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.