AI News HubLIVE
站內改寫2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:EULER: Exploring Underused Links with Evidence-Checked Return for Multi-Agent Mathematical Discovery

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2609.00032v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mathematical communities work with different objects, invariants, and tools, so transferring a problem across them is expensive and often skipped. We present EULER, a multi-agent system that takes such a transfer--a bridge--as its unit of search. Around a fixed conjecture, EULER runs direct, adjacent-domain, and distant-domain routes in competition; a bridge keeps its budget only if it supplies an operation the source representation cannot execute and its target-side evidence returns to the original statement along a checked implication. Six ordered stress tests reject invalid bridges before expensive search begins. We evaluate EULER on 120 recent conjectures. The conjectures were frozen before search and screened for contamination, and are drawn from public papers by authors who had recently published in the Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, a leading journal in combinatorics. EULER produced 10 proofs and 3 refutations, plus 45 scoped partial results. Two mechanisms held up under ablation: bridge-specific stress tests cut incorrect conclusions from 9 to 3, and bridge material combined with a target-native operation yielded a positive interaction of +4.2 resolved tasks that neither factor produced alone. Domain distance did not reliably predict success; executable operation gain and valid return did.

來源arXiv AI作者: Ren Zhenzhuo

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

--> [Submitted on 28 Aug 2026] Title:EULER: Exploring Underused Links with Evidence-Checked Return for Multi-Agent Mathematical Discovery View a PDF of the paper titled EULER: Exploring Underused Links with Evidence-Checked Return for Multi-Agent Mathematical Discovery, by Ren Zhenzhuo View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Mathematical communities work with different objects, invariants, and tools, so transferring a problem across them is expensive and often skipped. We present EULER, a multi-agent system that takes such a transfer--a bridge--as its unit of search. Around a fixed conjecture, EULER runs direct, adjacent-domain, and distant-domain routes in competition; a bridge keeps its budget only if it supplies an operation the source representation cannot execute and its target-side evidence returns to the original statement along a checked implication. Six ordered stress tests reject invalid bridges before expensive search begins. We evaluate EULER on 120 recent conjectures. The conjectures were frozen before search and screened for contamination, and are drawn from public papers by authors who had recently published in the Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, a leading journal in combinatorics. EULER produced 10 proofs and 3 refutations, plus 45 scoped partial results. Two mechanisms held up under ablation: bridge-specific stress tests cut incorrect conclusions from 9 to 3, and bridge material combined with a target-native operation yielded a positive interaction of +4.2 resolved tasks that neither factor produced alone. Domain distance did not reliably predict success; executable operation gain and valid return did. Comments: 55 pages, 10 figures, 29 tables; includes a 13-page companion candidate-proof manuscript as Appendix P Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA) Cite as: arXiv:2609.00032 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2609.00032v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.00032 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Zhenzhuo Ren [view email] [v1] Fri, 28 Aug 2026 17:36:00 UTC (385 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled EULER: Exploring Underused Links with Evidence-Checked Return for Multi-Agent Mathematical Discovery, by Ren Zhenzhuo View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.MA References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)