AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Entity tracking emerges in sub-billion parameter language models and exceeds human performance in naturalistic narratives

arXiv:2608.18083v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Understanding language requires tracking entities across discourse - i.e., knowing where things are and how they change, even when not explicitly stated. Whether language models perform such tracking in a human-like fashion remains unclear, in part because existing evaluations rely on artificial tasks, far removed from natural language comprehension, and lack comparisons to humans. Here, we evaluate entity tracking in both language models and humans (N = 48) using naturalistic narratives at multiple levels of complexity. In humans, we find that entity tracking degrades specifically with narrative complexity, not narrative length. In language models, we find that human-level entity tracking is already present at 410 million parameters - well below the multi-billion parameter, code-specialised models identified by prior work - and improves with scale, with contemporary models far exceeding human performance. Together, these results demonstrate that entity tracking, a core component of language understanding, emerges at model scales far smaller than previously thought.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Karolina Dro\.zd\.z, Micha Heilbron

-->

[Submitted on 4 Jun 2026]

Title:Entity tracking emerges in sub-billion parameter language models and exceeds human performance in naturalistic narratives

View a PDF of the paper titled Entity tracking emerges in sub-billion parameter language models and exceeds human performance in naturalistic narratives, by Karolina Dro\.zd\.z and 1 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Understanding language requires tracking entities across discourse - i.e., knowing where things are and how they change, even when not explicitly stated. Whether language models perform such tracking in a human-like fashion remains unclear, in part because existing evaluations rely on artificial tasks, far removed from natural language comprehension, and lack comparisons to humans. Here, we evaluate entity tracking in both language models and humans (N = 48) using naturalistic narratives at multiple levels of complexity. In humans, we find that entity tracking degrades specifically with narrative complexity, not narrative length. In language models, we find that human-level entity tracking is already present at 410 million parameters - well below the multi-billion parameter, code-specialised models identified by prior work - and improves with scale, with contemporary models far exceeding human performance. Together, these results demonstrate that entity tracking, a core component of language understanding, emerges at model scales far smaller than previously thought.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2608.18083 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2608.18083v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18083

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Karolina Drożdż [view email] [v1] Thu, 4 Jun 2026 11:17:37 UTC (589 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Entity tracking emerges in sub-billion parameter language models and exceeds human performance in naturalistic narratives, by Karolina Dro\.zd\.z and 1 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-08

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)