Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Entity-Aware Evaluation of OCR Systems for Historical Document Transcription

Summary

A new study proposes entity-level analysis as a complement to character error rate for assessing OCR quality in historical documents, comparing sequence-recognition OCR systems, OCR-specialized vision-language models, and general-purpose vision-language models on 175 Berrutti Archive documents with 5,209 manually annotated entity mentions.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Camilo Mari\~no (UDELAR, CB), Diego Belzarena (UDELAR, CB), Marina Gardella (CB), Ignacio Ram\'irez (UDELAR), Gregory Randall (UDELAR), Jean-Michel Morel (LU - Hong Kong)
Entity-Aware Evaluation of OCR Systems for Historical Document Transcription
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 7 Oct 2026]

Title:Entity-Aware Evaluation of OCR Systems for Historical Document Transcription

View a PDF of the paper titled Entity-Aware Evaluation of OCR Systems for Historical Document Transcription, by Camilo Mari\~no (UDELAR and 7 other authors

View PDF

Abstract:Optical Character Recognition (OCR) is essential for digitizing historical archives, yet standard evaluation metrics such as Character Error Rate (CER) do not necessarily reflect whether meaningful information, such as names, dates, and identifiers, is preserved. In this work, we investigate entitylevel analysis of OCR errors as a complementary perspective for evaluating OCR quality in historical documents. Using a publicly available benchmark of 175 documents from the Berrutti Archive, augmented with 5,209 manually annotated entity mentions that will be released upon acceptance, we compare sequence-recognition OCR systems, OCR-specialized vision-language models, and general-purpose vision-language models. Beyond global transcription accuracy, we analyze entity preservation and recoverability under varying character-level edit tolerances. Our experiments show that OCR rankings depend on the evaluation criterion: while Qwen 3.6 achieves the highest entity coverage across all tested tolerances, several systems with lower exact-match coverage recover substantially when small errors are tolerated, suggesting that many of their errors correspond to localized character-level deviations rather than fundamentally incorrect entity transcriptions. Conversely, some systems remain unable to recover many entities even under relaxed matching. These findings show that OCR quality cannot be fully characterized by aggregate transcription metrics alone and highlight the importance of evaluating how OCR errors affect the preservation and recoverability of meaningful information.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Image and Video Processing (eess.IV)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.33004 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.33004v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.33004

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Diego Belzarena [view email] [via CCSD proxy] [v1] Wed, 7 Oct 2026 12:12:01 UTC (469 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Entity-Aware Evaluation of OCR Systems for Historical Document Transcription, by Camilo Mari\~no (UDELAR and 7 other authors

View PDF

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI cs.CV cs.LG eess eess.IV

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • Standard CER metrics do not capture whether names, dates, and identifiers are preserved
  • The benchmark covers 175 Berrutti Archive documents and adds 5,209 manually annotated entity mentions, to be released upon acceptance
  • Qwen 3.6 achieves the highest entity coverage across all tested tolerances, but OCR rankings shift with the evaluation criterion
  • Several systems with lower exact-match coverage recover substantially when small errors are tolerated, indicating localized character-level deviations

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.