AI News HubLIVE
原文2 min read

Ensembles of Large Language Models for Identifying EQ-5D Studies in PubMed Based on Their Abstracts

This study investigates using Google's Gemini and Gemma LLMs to automate detection of EQ-5D studies in PubMed from abstracts. A multi-phase framework with few-shot prompting, weight ensembling, and soft stacking meta-classifier is proposed. Evaluating nine LLMs on expert-labeled data, the weighted ensemble of gemini-2.5-pro, gemma-3-12b, and gemma-3-27b achieved 0.74 weighted F1-score and accuracy, outperforming individual models. Ensembling improved precision-recall balance, and soft stacking enhanced reliability and interpretability. Results suggest ensemble LLMs are a reliable, scalable approach for automating biomedical screening.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Zhyar Rzgar K. Rostam, M\'arta P\'entek, J\'anos Tibor Czere, Zsombor Zrubka, L\'aszl\'o Gul\'acsi, G\'abor Kert\'esz

[2606.19345] Ensembles of Large Language Models for Identifying EQ-5D Studies in PubMed Based on Their Abstracts

[Submitted on 24 Apr 2026]

Title:Ensembles of Large Language Models for Identifying EQ-5D Studies in PubMed Based on Their Abstracts

View a PDF of the paper titled Ensembles of Large Language Models for Identifying EQ-5D Studies in PubMed Based on Their Abstracts, by Zhyar Rzgar K. Rostam and 5 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:The rapid increase in scientific publications leads to the fact that manual study screening in systematic literature reviews (SLRs) is increasingly resource consuming, inefficient, and inconsistent. Classifying studies that clearly report health-related quality-of-life results, such as EQ-5D data, requires a high level of clinical interpretation and poses challenges for human reviewers. This study investigates the use of Google's Gemini and Gemma large language models (LLMs) in automating EQ-5D detection in the PubMed biomedical database based only on published abstracts. A multi-phase framework is proposed that integrates few-shot prompting, weight ensembling aggregation, and a soft stacking meta-classifier. Nine LLMs are evaluated on a dataset of PubMed studies manually labeled by two experts regarding EQ-5D reporting. The weighted ensemble of gemini-2.5-pro, gemma-3-12b, and gemma-3-27b obtained a 0.74 weighted F1-score and 0.74 accuracy, exceeding individually attained results. The ensembling of top-performing models improved the balance between precision and recall compared to individual models, while the soft stacking approach provided greater reliability and interpretability. Feature analysis shows that the probability results from the models are important in guiding the final predictions. The findings suggest that an ensemble-based LLM setup is a reliable and scalable approach for automating screening in biomedical research.

Comments: 6 pages, 7 tables, 8 equations

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2606.19345 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2606.19345v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.19345

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Zhyar Kwekha Rostam Mr. [view email] [v1] Fri, 24 Apr 2026 21:42:39 UTC (648 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Ensembles of Large Language Models for Identifying EQ-5D Studies in PubMed Based on Their Abstracts, by Zhyar Rzgar K. Rostam and 5 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-06

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)