Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Emergent Object Binding Has a Finite Spatial Horizon

Summary

arXiv:2610.00006v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Pretrained Vision Transformers encode whether two image patches belong to the same object. This IsSameObject signal is decodable from frozen patch embeddings at high accuracy, which suggests that object binding emerges from self-supervised pretraining alone. We show that this single accuracy number hides the structure of the signal. Binding is local: the probability that two patches of the same object are decoded as bound falls off monotonically with the distance between them and levels off at a nonzero floor, a falloff well described by an exponential with a finite length scale. This decay holds across object sizes, across three families of probe, on both ADE20K and COCO, and across DINO and CLIP backbones, which indicates that it is a prop…

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Mayank Singal
Emergent Object Binding Has a Finite Spatial Horizon
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 9 Jul 2026]

Title:Emergent Object Binding Has a Finite Spatial Horizon

View a PDF of the paper titled Emergent Object Binding Has a Finite Spatial Horizon, by Mayank Singal

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Pretrained Vision Transformers encode whether two image patches belong to the same object. This IsSameObject signal is decodable from frozen patch embeddings at high accuracy, which suggests that object binding emerges from self-supervised pretraining alone. We show that this single accuracy number hides the structure of the signal. Binding is local: the probability that two patches of the same object are decoded as bound falls off monotonically with the distance between them and levels off at a nonzero floor, a falloff well described by an exponential with a finite length scale. This decay holds across object sizes, across three families of probe, on both ADE20K and COCO, and across DINO and CLIP backbones, which indicates that it is a property of the representation rather than of the decoder. Reading binding as local spatial coherence with a finite range accounts for a set of behaviors that the aggregate score leaves unexplained: binding weakens on large objects, separates distinct objects of the same class less reliably than objects of different classes, and groups object parts with their wholes. It is, by contrast, unaffected by occlusion once object size is controlled. We map each behavior with confounds controlled. As a preliminary observation, the horizon and its floor are organized at different depths in DINOv2 and DINOv3, which we report as suggestive given the small number of layers probed and the confound between the two models.

Comments: 14 pages, 4 figures

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.00006 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2610.00006v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.00006

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Mayank Singal [view email] [v1] Thu, 9 Jul 2026 02:41:15 UTC (1,052 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Emergent Object Binding Has a Finite Spatial Horizon, by Mayank Singal

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.00006v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Pretrained Vision Transformers encode whether two image patches belong to the same object. This IsSameObject signal is decodable fr…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.