Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Efficient Learning of Survival Analysis Models Under Outcome-Dependent Truncation and Censoring

Summary

arXiv:2610.12538v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern machine learning models are typically trained on data assumed to be representative of the predictive tasks the model will face in the future, but practical datasets violate this assumption. We focus on outcome-dependent truncation in which an observation appears in the training data depending on its label. Our work connects two largely distinct literatures: efficient learning under truncation and survival analysis. Existing methods for truncated survival analysis do not characterize the optimization landscape and instead rely on iterative procedures such as expectation maximization. We address this gap and prove that Cox regression can be efficiently learned under truncated and right-censored data using first-order optimization when t…

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Itai Zilberstein, Ioannis Anagnostides, Arman Kilic, Tuomas Sandholm
Efficient Learning of Survival Analysis Models Under Outcome-Dependent Truncation and Censoring
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 8 Oct 2026]

Title:Efficient Learning of Survival Analysis Models Under Outcome-Dependent Truncation and Censoring

View a PDF of the paper titled Efficient Learning of Survival Analysis Models Under Outcome-Dependent Truncation and Censoring, by Itai Zilberstein and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Modern machine learning models are typically trained on data assumed to be representative of the predictive tasks the model will face in the future, but practical datasets violate this assumption. We focus on outcome-dependent truncation in which an observation appears in the training data depending on its label. Our work connects two largely distinct literatures: efficient learning under truncation and survival analysis. Existing methods for truncated survival analysis do not characterize the optimization landscape and instead rely on iterative procedures such as expectation maximization. We address this gap and prove that Cox regression can be efficiently learned under truncated and right-censored data using first-order optimization when the baseline hazard is known (despite nonconvexity). In contrast, when the baseline hazard is learned jointly, we construct identifiable and correctly specified models whose negative log-likelihood contains strict suboptimal local minima. On experiments with four survival datasets, we show that accounting for truncation reduces the prediction bias induced by naive Cox regression and extends to neural networks. We also show orders of magnitude speedups compared to standard expectation maximization.

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.12538 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.12538v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.12538

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Itai Zilberstein [view email] [v1] Thu, 8 Oct 2026 13:32:56 UTC (301 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Efficient Learning of Survival Analysis Models Under Outcome-Dependent Truncation and Censoring, by Itai Zilberstein and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

ResearchersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.12538v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern machine learning models are typically trained on data assumed to be representative of the predictive tasks the model will fa…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.