Dynamic Influence-Weighted Distillation for Single-IMU Activity Recognition
arXiv:2608.24904v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Inertial sensors at multiple body locations can improve activity recognition, but requiring every sensor at inference increases the deployment burden. We study whether four synchronized IMUs available during training can improve a student that uses only the right-arm IMU during fitting and inference. A frozen four-IMU teacher provides logit and feature targets. Fixed-weight knowledge distillation applies each target with the same strength to every fitting sample, although the student may not benefit equally from them. We introduce dynamic influence weighting (DIW), which tests a one-step candidate update on separate fold-internal training participants. DIW then assigns separate sample-wise gates to the logit and feature losses. On WEAR, we evaluate 19 labels and 68,298 complete windows from 22 participants using subject-disjoint five-fold cross-validation. Pooled out-of-fold macro-F1 is 0.561820 for Supervised and 0.571623 for Fixed-weight KD. DIW reaches 0.638451, gains of 7.66 and 6.68 percentage points, respectively. It exceeds Supervised for 18 of 19 labels and 21 of 22 held-out participants. All three routes retain the same 80,915-parameter right-arm student at inference. Under this protocol, DIW converts training-only multi-position information into a stronger single-IMU model without changing deployed sensing or the student forward graph.
-->
[Submitted on 17 Jul 2026]
Title:Dynamic Influence-Weighted Distillation for Single-IMU Activity Recognition
View a PDF of the paper titled Dynamic Influence-Weighted Distillation for Single-IMU Activity Recognition, by Bingxuan Xie
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Inertial sensors at multiple body locations can improve activity recognition, but requiring every sensor at inference increases the deployment burden. We study whether four synchronized IMUs available during training can improve a student that uses only the right-arm IMU during fitting and inference. A frozen four-IMU teacher provides logit and feature targets. Fixed-weight knowledge distillation applies each target with the same strength to every fitting sample, although the student may not benefit equally from them. We introduce dynamic influence weighting (DIW), which tests a one-step candidate update on separate fold-internal training participants. DIW then assigns separate sample-wise gates to the logit and feature losses. On WEAR, we evaluate 19 labels and 68,298 complete windows from 22 participants using subject-disjoint five-fold cross-validation. Pooled out-of-fold macro-F1 is 0.561820 for Supervised and 0.571623 for Fixed-weight KD. DIW reaches 0.638451, gains of 7.66 and 6.68 percentage points, respectively. It exceeds Supervised for 18 of 19 labels and 21 of 22 held-out participants. All three routes retain the same 80,915-parameter right-arm student at inference. Under this protocol, DIW converts training-only multi-position information into a stronger single-IMU model without changing deployed sensing or the student forward graph.
Comments: 12 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables
Subjects:
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.24904 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.24904v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.24904
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Bingxuan Xie [view email] [v1] Fri, 17 Jul 2026 16:27:24 UTC (204 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Dynamic Influence-Weighted Distillation for Single-IMU Activity Recognition, by Bingxuan Xie
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.LG
new | recent | 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs cs.HC
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Loading...
Data provided by:
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)