Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Driving Intents Amplify Planning-Oriented Reinforcement Learning

Summary

DIAL framework addresses mode collapse in continuous-action policies via two stages: intent-conditioned flow matching with CFG expands sampling distribution; multi-intent GRPO preserves diversity. On WOD-E2E, intent-CFG surpasses human demonstrations for the first time with RFS 9.14, and multi-intent GRPO improves held-out RFS from 7.681 to 8.211.

SourcearXiv RoboticsAuthor: Hengtong Lu, Victor Shea-Jay Huang, Chengmin Yang, Pengfei Jing, Jifeng Dai, Yan Xie, Benjin Zhu
Driving Intents Amplify Planning-Oriented Reinforcement Learning
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.12625] Driving Intents Amplify Planning-Oriented Reinforcement Learning

[Submitted on 12 May 2026]

Title:Driving Intents Amplify Planning-Oriented Reinforcement Learning

View a PDF of the paper titled Driving Intents Amplify Planning-Oriented Reinforcement Learning, by Hengtong Lu and 6 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Continuous-action policies trained on a single demonstrated trajectory per scene suffer from mode collapse: samples cluster around the demonstrated maneuver and the policy cannot represent semantically distinct alternatives. Under preference-based evaluation, this caps best-of-N performance -- even oracle selection cannot recover what the sampling distribution does not contain. We introduce DIAL, a two-stage Driving-Intent-Amplified reinforcement Learning framework for preference-aligned continuous-action driving policies. In the first stage, DIAL conditions the flow-matching action head on a discrete intent label with classifier-free guidance (CFG), which expands the sampling distribution along distinct maneuver modes and breaks single-demonstration mode collapse. In the second stage, DIAL carries this expanded distribution into preference RL through multi-intent GRPO, which spans all intent classes within every preference group and prevents fine-tuning from re-collapsing around the currently preferred mode. Instantiated for end-to-end driving with eight rule-derived intents and evaluated on WOD-E2E: competitive Vision-to-Action (VA) and Vision-Language-Action (VLA) Supervised Finetuning (SFT) baselines plateau below the human-driven demonstration at best-of-128, with the strongest prior (RAP) capping at Rater Feedback Score (RFS) 8.5 even with best-of-64; intent-CFG sampling lifts this ceiling to RFS 9.14 at best-of-128, surpassing both the prior best (RAP 8.5) and the human-driven demonstration (8.13) for the first time; and multi-intent GRPO improves held-out RFS from 7.681 to 8.211, while every single-intent baseline peaks lower and degrades by training end. These results suggest that the bottleneck of preference RL on continuous-action policies trained from demonstrations is not only how to update the policy, but to expand and preserve the sampling distribution being optimized.

Comments: Work in progress. Project page: this https URL

Subjects:

Robotics (cs.RO); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.12625 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2605.12625v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.12625

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Benjin Zhu [view email] [v1] Tue, 12 May 2026 18:10:19 UTC (220 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Driving Intents Amplify Planning-Oriented Reinforcement Learning, by Hengtong Lu and 6 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.RO

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CV

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • Single-demonstration policies suffer mode collapse, unable to represent semantically distinct alternatives
  • DIAL expands and preserves sampling distribution via intent-CFG and multi-intent GRPO
  • Intent-CFG achieves RFS 9.14 at best-of-128, surpassing human demonstration (8.13) and prior best (RAP 8.5)
  • Multi-intent GRPO improves held-out RFS from 7.681 to 8.211

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.