Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

DRIFT: Refining Instruction Data via On-Policy Data Attribution

Summary

DRIFT proposes a novel method for refining supervised fine-tuning data by using on-policy influence functions, which address key limitations of standard influence functions. It improves the data distribution to enhance the capability upper bound of LLMs, and achieves consistent improvements on 7B models.

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Zefan Wang, Lincheng Li, Tianyu Yu, Yuan Yao
DRIFT: Refining Instruction Data via On-Policy Data Attribution
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2606.18307] DRIFT: Refining Instruction Data via On-Policy Data Attribution

[Submitted on 16 Jun 2026]

Title:DRIFT: Refining Instruction Data via On-Policy Data Attribution

View a PDF of the paper titled DRIFT: Refining Instruction Data via On-Policy Data Attribution, by Zefan Wang and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Optimizing the training data distribution for Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) dictates the capability of Large Language Models (LLMs). While existing data curation methods excel at accelerating training under constrained budgets, they are less suited to elevating the capability upper bound. The challenge here is no longer to identify a smaller subset that preserves performance, but to refine the data distribution toward instances most capable of improving the final model. To address this problem, we explore instance-level data attribution using Influence Functions (IF). We identify that standard IF formulations struggle in this setting due to two structural limitations: a proximity gap caused by off-policy validation targets, and a severe bias towards gradient norm. We propose DRIFT (Data Refinement via On-Policy Influence Functions for Supervised Fine-Tuning). Instead of relying on external reference data, DRIFT utilizes the model's on-policy rollouts as validation targets, which empirically minimizes the parameter proximity gap and better aligns with the local neighborhood assumption of IF. It further applies signed weighting based on trajectory correctness and debiases influence scores against the gradient hacking issue, allowing a small set of validation queries to act as reliable anchors for attributing the full dataset. Experiments on 7B-parameter instruction and reasoning models show that DRIFT consistently raises the performance ceiling on both, outperforming existing data curation baselines.

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2606.18307 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2606.18307v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.18307

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Zefan Wang [view email] [v1] Tue, 16 Jun 2026 07:21:49 UTC (1,022 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled DRIFT: Refining Instruction Data via On-Policy Data Attribution, by Zefan Wang and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-06

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • DRIFT uses on-policy rollouts to address the proximity gap and gradient norm bias in influence functions.
  • It applies signed weighting and debiasing to make a small set of validation queries reliable anchors.
  • Experiments show consistent performance improvements on 7B instruction and reasoning models.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.

DRIFT: Refining Instruction Data via On-Policy Data Attribution | AI News Hub