AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Double-Helix Active Geometry: LiDAR-Anchored Multi-View Depth with Selective Abstention

DH-Active is a lightweight, training-free geometry back-end that uses LiDAR as a metric ruler to improve multi-view depth estimation. It anchors near-field returns via PnP, triangulates visual features, and selectively abstains in ill-conditioned regions. The method runs at 1.11 ms on CPU, ~38x faster than a DINOv2-L GPU branch, and achieves 1.4-6.7% median relative error on benchmarks.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Jinwen Wen

-->

[Submitted on 28 Jun 2026]

Title:Double-Helix Active Geometry: LiDAR-Anchored Multi-View Depth with Selective Abstention

View a PDF of the paper titled Double-Helix Active Geometry: LiDAR-Anchored Multi-View Depth with Selective Abstention, by Jinwen Wen

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Consumer depth sensors such as the LiDAR scanner on recent iPhones provide metric range, but their useful range is short and their returns are sparse. We present DH-Active, a lightweight, training-free geometry back-end that treats the sensor as a metric ruler rather than the sole source of depth. Near-field returns anchor the metric relative pose of two views through PnP; visually trackable samples without a valid depth return are then triangulated under that pose. A parallax/reprojection gate abstains wherever the geometry is ill-conditioned, leaving an explicit hole and a selective score instead of forcing an estimate. The measured core front end, including spiral sampling, sparse back-projection, and hole taxonomy but excluding preprocessing and multi-view recovery, runs at 1.11 ms median latency on CPU (OpenCV using 14 threads), about 38 times faster than a DINOv2-L visual branch on GPU in our timing setup. Across two iPhone captures and the public TUM RGB-D and ARKitScenes benchmarks, held-out depth is recovered at 1.4 to 6.7 percent median relative error. In a controlled ARKitScenes protocol that uses only returns within 2 m to set scale and an independent laser scan as ground truth, DH-Active achieves 64.2 percent scene-median coverage of evaluable far-field candidates at 13.4 percent scene-median relative error; direct triangulation from the device trajectory is not usable. We also report the alternatives that failed in our tests: single-frame defocus, classical focus-stack depth, defocus-LiDAR fusion, point-to-point ICP over a good visual-inertial track, and attention-to-holes resampling. A 1.26 B learned model remains more accurate after oracle scale alignment. The contribution here is narrower: metric sparse depth, explicit abstention, zero learned parameters, and near-millisecond CPU cost.

Comments: 10 pages, 3 figures, 7 tables

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.02561 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2607.02561v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.02561

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Jinwen Wen [view email] [v1] Sun, 28 Jun 2026 17:15:33 UTC (48 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Double-Helix Active Geometry: LiDAR-Anchored Multi-View Depth with Selective Abstention, by Jinwen Wen

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)