Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Don't Collapse Your Features: Why CenterLoss Hurts OOD Detection and Multi-Scale Mahalanobis Wins

Summary

GOEN achieves 0.9483 OOD AUROC on CIFAR-10, outperforming deep ensembles and other baselines. CenterLoss is found to degrade OOD detection despite improving classification accuracy. Training takes under 20 minutes on a single GPU.

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Rahul D Ray
Don't Collapse Your Features: Why CenterLoss Hurts OOD Detection and Multi-Scale Mahalanobis Wins
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.21493] Don't Collapse Your Features: Why CenterLoss Hurts OOD Detection and Multi-Scale Mahalanobis Wins

[Submitted on 10 Apr 2026]

Title:Don't Collapse Your Features: Why CenterLoss Hurts OOD Detection and Multi-Scale Mahalanobis Wins

View a PDF of the paper titled Don't Collapse Your Features: Why CenterLoss Hurts OOD Detection and Multi-Scale Mahalanobis Wins, by Rahul D Ray

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:The ability to detect out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs is fundamental to safe deployment of machine learning systems. Yet, current methods often rely on feature representations that are optimised solely for classification accuracy, neglecting the distinct requirements of epistemic uncertainty. We introduce GOEN (Geometry-Optimised Epistemic Network), a simple pipeline that combines multi-scale features, L2 normalisation, Mahalanobis distance, and a calibration head trained with real hard OOD examples. Through systematic ablation we uncover a counter-intuitive finding: CenterLoss, a popular regulariser for feature compactness, significantly degrades OOD detection performance, reducing average OOD AUROC from 0.9483 to 0.9366 despite improving classification accuracy. The best variant, GOEN-NoCenterLoss, achieves an average OOD AUROC of 0.9483, surpassing all baselines including deep ensembles (0.8827), KNN (0.8967), and ODIN (0.8870) on CIFAR-10 benchmarks, while maintaining competitive in-distribution accuracy. Our results challenge the prevailing assumption that better classification geometry automatically leads to better epistemic uncertainty. Instead, we show that overly tight feature clusters compress inter-class margins and distort the covariance structure needed for effective OOD detection. GOEN is efficient, training in under 20 minutes on a single GPU, and provides a practical blueprint for building AI systems that reliably recognise their own limitations.

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.21493 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2605.21493v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.21493

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Rahul D Ray Ray [view email] [v1] Fri, 10 Apr 2026 18:27:46 UTC (908 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Don't Collapse Your Features: Why CenterLoss Hurts OOD Detection and Multi-Scale Mahalanobis Wins, by Rahul D Ray

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI cs.CV

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • GOEN achieves OOD AUROC of 0.9483, surpassing baselines.
  • CenterLoss degrades OOD detection despite improving classification accuracy.
  • GOEN trains in under 20 minutes on a single GPU.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.

Don't Collapse Your Features: Why CenterLoss Hurts OOD Detection and Multi-Scale Mahalanobis Wins | AI News Hub