跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
來源內容 · 翻譯待補全2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:Does a Learned Corrector Beat a Simple Retreat? Evidence from a Frozen VLA

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2610.06921v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Before deploying runtime recovery for a frozen vision-language-action (VLA) policy, one must establish that an intervention improves success beyond ordinary run-to-run variation and that its complexity adds value over a simple action. We evaluate these questions on frozen $\pi_{0.5}$ across four RoboTwin tasks. For each test seed, we pair rollouts with and without correction and include a same-seed base-policy re-run as a placebo. Seed-cluster intervals and prespecified comparison rules assess net gains against stochastic outcome changes. Across 3,888 paired episodes, the full pipeline raises success on beat_allowbreak block_allowbreak hammer by $+13.5$\,pp (95\% interval $[+9.4,+17.7]$), with no detectable gain o…

來源arXiv Robotics作者: Chenchao Sheng, Zhuang Jiang, Liuhaichen Yang, Ningwei Bai, Zezhi Tang
待翻譯:Does a Learned Corrector Beat a Simple Retreat? Evidence from a Frozen VLA
報告錯誤

更正渠道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

[Submitted on 2 Oct 2026] Title:Does a Learned Corrector Beat a Simple Retreat? Evidence from a Frozen VLA View a PDF of the paper titled Does a Learned Corrector Beat a Simple Retreat? Evidence from a Frozen VLA, by Chenchao Sheng and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Before deploying runtime recovery for a frozen vision-language-action (VLA) policy, one must establish that an intervention improves success beyond ordinary run-to-run variation and that its complexity adds value over a simple action. We evaluate these questions on frozen $\pi_{0.5}$ across four RoboTwin tasks. For each test seed, we pair rollouts with and without correction and include a same-seed base-policy re-run as a placebo. Seed-cluster intervals and prespecified comparison rules assess net gains against stochastic outcome changes. Across 3,888 paired episodes, the full pipeline raises success on beat_allowbreak block_allowbreak hammer by $+13.5$\,pp (95\% interval $[+9.4,+17.7]$), with no detectable gain on the other three tasks at the deployed weight. Among failed base episodes on the responsive task, $43.2\%$ succeed on a plain re-run, compared with $63.5\%$ after correction; many nominal rescues therefore reflect the base policy's own variability. A fixed-time trigger and scripted return to an earlier joint configuration produce a net gain with no detected difference from the learned pipeline across two rounds, although our prespecified equivalence criterion is not met consistently. Pausing and a constant-action control do not yield comparable gains. On this benchmark, the decision to intervene depends strongly on the task, and a paired placebo plus a simple retreat baseline are needed to establish what learned correction contributes. Comments: 15 pages, 6 figures Subjects: Robotics (cs.RO) Cite as: arXiv:2610.06921 [cs.RO] (or arXiv:2610.06921v1 [cs.RO] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.06921 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Ningwei Bai [view email] [v1] Fri, 2 Oct 2026 21:57:32 UTC (232 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Does a Learned Corrector Beat a Simple Retreat? Evidence from a Frozen VLA, by Chenchao Sheng and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.RO new | recent | 2026-10 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展開要點與分析

文章情報

工程師進階

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級元數據。
  • arXiv:2610.06921v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Before deploying runtime recovery for a frozen vision-language-action (VLA) policy, one must establish that an intervention improve…

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。