Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Do Quantum Models Scale Like LLMs?

Summary

arXiv:2609.20912v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this work, we study the neural scaling laws of RydbergGPT, an autoregressive transformer model trained on qubit projective measurement data gathered from interacting Rydberg atom arrays. The quantum system is known to exhibit a finite-size remnant of a critical point as the laser detuning parameter is varied. We find that near the critical point the transformer loss as a function of training dataset size is well described by a power-law with a loss floor correction. However, away from criticality the quality of the power-law description is substantially reduced. We then compare the statistical structure of both Rydberg measurements and natural-language corpora using an entropy-normalised, finite sample corrected mutual information "two-po…

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: David S. Berman, Ying-Jer Kao, Roger G. Melko, Alexander G. Stapleton
Do Quantum Models Scale Like LLMs?
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 17 Sep 2026]

Title:Do Quantum Models Scale Like LLMs?

View a PDF of the paper titled Do Quantum Models Scale Like LLMs?, by David S. Berman and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:In this work, we study the neural scaling laws of RydbergGPT, an autoregressive transformer model trained on qubit projective measurement data gathered from interacting Rydberg atom arrays. The quantum system is known to exhibit a finite-size remnant of a critical point as the laser detuning parameter is varied. We find that near the critical point the transformer loss as a function of training dataset size is well described by a power-law with a loss floor correction. However, away from criticality the quality of the power-law description is substantially reduced. We then compare the statistical structure of both Rydberg measurements and natural-language corpora using an entropy-normalised, finite sample corrected mutual information "two-point" function. We find that near-critical statistics of the two point functions are closest to those observed in natural-language, whilst other qubit configurations far from the critical point have two-point functions that decay more rapidly. This supports the hypothesis that multi-scale dependence contributes to stable neural scaling, and that scaling behaviour should be viewed as a property of the model-data pair.

Comments: 10 pages, 6 figures

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.20912 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.20912v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.20912

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Alexander Stapleton [view email] [v1] Thu, 17 Sep 2026 18:00:00 UTC (96 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Do Quantum Models Scale Like LLMs?, by David S. Berman and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs quant-ph

References & Citations

INSPIRE HEP

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.20912v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this work, we study the neural scaling laws of RydbergGPT, an autoregressive transformer model trained on qubit projective measu…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.