Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Do LLMs Understand Context? A Knowledge Graph-Based Evaluation Framework

Summary

arXiv:2609.30484v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable linguistic capabilities, a profound question lingers at their core: do these models truly comprehend context or simply excel at pattern matching on an unprecedented scale? Contextual understanding in LLMs refers to the ability to correctly extract relevant information from a given context, integrate it into a coherent internal representation, and reason over it to produce factually consistent and contextually grounded responses. However, traditional methods such as BiLingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU) and perplexity simply measure surface-level performance. This reveals a critical gap in question answering (QA), where responses must be contextually grounded rather than simply bein…

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Subavarshana Arumugam, Mamta Nallaretnam, Kithuni Wickramasinghe, Chamath Gunapala, Pragatheeswaran Vipulanandan, Kamal Premaratne, Uthayasanker Thayasivam
Do LLMs Understand Context? A Knowledge Graph-Based Evaluation Framework
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 24 Sep 2026]

Title:Do LLMs Understand Context? A Knowledge Graph-Based Evaluation Framework

View a PDF of the paper titled Do LLMs Understand Context? A Knowledge Graph-Based Evaluation Framework, by Subavarshana Arumugam and 6 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:While large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable linguistic capabilities, a profound question lingers at their core: do these models truly comprehend context or simply excel at pattern matching on an unprecedented scale? Contextual understanding in LLMs refers to the ability to correctly extract relevant information from a given context, integrate it into a coherent internal representation, and reason over it to produce factually consistent and contextually grounded responses. However, traditional methods such as BiLingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU) and perplexity simply measure surface-level performance. This reveals a critical gap in question answering (QA), where responses must be contextually grounded rather than simply being memorized associations. To fill this void, we propose a novel knowledge graph (KG) based evaluation framework for LLM contextual understanding in QA. Central to this is Semantic Structural Similarity for KGs (S3KG), a hybrid similarity measure combining structural and semantic signals into a single score. In addition, a diagnostic analysis framework is developed to identify and categorize reasoning errors at the triplet level, enabling fine-grained analysis of model failures. Together, across nine benchmarks, S3KG achieves F1 gains of up to $+7.6$ points over the strongest baseline and AUROC up to $0.973$.

Comments: Accepted in : AACL-IJCNLP 2026

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.30484 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2609.30484v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30484

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Pragatheeswaran Vipulanandan [view email] [v1] Thu, 24 Sep 2026 19:20:08 UTC (1,296 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Do LLMs Understand Context? A Knowledge Graph-Based Evaluation Framework, by Subavarshana Arumugam and 6 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.30484v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable linguistic capabilities, a profound question lingers at their core: do…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.