Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Do Active SAE Feature Planes Carry More Holonomy? A Preregistered Reversal in Gemma

Summary

A preregistered experiment tested whether holonomy concentrates on active sparse-autoencoder (SAE) feature planes in Gemma 2 2B. The prediction was falsified in reverse: active-feature planes carried less holonomy than matched mixed-feature controls. The result is a narrow operational reversal, not a causal claim, leaving the cause open.

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Larry Richards
Do Active SAE Feature Planes Carry More Holonomy? A Preregistered Reversal in Gemma
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 9 Jul 2026]

Title:Do Active SAE Feature Planes Carry More Holonomy? A Preregistered Reversal in Gemma

View a PDF of the paper titled Do Active SAE Feature Planes Carry More Holonomy? A Preregistered Reversal in Gemma, by Larry Richards

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:This paper tests whether holonomy concentrates on active sparse-autoencoder (SAE) feature planes in Gemma 2 2B, a concrete operationalization of the broader semantic-concentration prediction. Holonomy is measured at the final-token layer-12 to layer-13 residual-stream readout by carrying a local frame around small loops using the instrument's restricted-Jacobian transport rule, then normalizing the resulting rotation by enclosed area. The design, materiality threshold, analysis, and verdict rules were preregistered and frozen before the analysed measurements were inspected. The prediction was falsified in reverse: active-feature planes carried less holonomy than matched mixed-feature controls, with an adjusted log contrast of -0.29439 and 95% interval [-0.43989, -0.14889]. A magnitude-only explanation was not supported in this design, while the three-way ordering across random, mixed-feature, and active-feature planes was undefined at matched magnitude because common support failed. Post-freeze diagnostics at the same readout supported the area law on a small validation subset, bounded matched-center displacement under a simple paired regression, and identified transport distortion as a live mechanism or confound. The result is therefore a narrow, auditable operational reversal, not a causal claim that meaning suppresses holonomy. The cause remains open, with activation-strength geometry, degree of feature engagement, dictionary geometry, matched-center displacement, activation-manifold proximity, and transport shear as live alternatives.

Comments: 23 pages, 5 figures. Preregistered confirmatory study; frozen experiment record archived at Zenodo, doi:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20960027

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.20522 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2607.20522v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.20522

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Larry Richards [view email] [v1] Thu, 9 Jul 2026 05:04:25 UTC (48 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Do Active SAE Feature Planes Carry More Holonomy? A Preregistered Reversal in Gemma, by Larry Richards

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

ResearchersAdvanced

Key points

  • The preregistered experiment tested the holonomy concentration hypothesis on active SAE feature planes.
  • Results showed active-feature planes carried less holonomy than mixed-feature controls, reversing the prediction.
  • A magnitude-only explanation was unsupported; three-way ordering undefined due to failed common support.
  • Post-freeze diagnostics supported area law and identified transport distortion as a possible mechanism or confound.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.