Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Diminishing Returns of Data in Sparse Autoencoders: Functional Behavior does not Guarantee Feature Reproducibility

Summary

arXiv:2610.20680v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are typically trained on hundreds of millions to billions of activation tokens, yet little work has tested whether this scale is necessary. We study how much activation data SAEs need by training four SAE architectures on three language models with budgets ranging from 5M tokens to a 500M-token reference. We measure two notions of convergence: functional behavior on standard evaluations and one-to-one reproducibility of learned features. Functional data requirements are strongly metric-dependent: reconstruction often approaches the full-data reference at substantially smaller budgets, whereas feature reproducibility continues to improve with data. For Gemma-2-2B BatchTopK, the fraction of strictly matched features…

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Sambit Ghosh, Madelyn Mathai, R. Venkatesh Babu, Chirag Agarwal
Diminishing Returns of Data in Sparse Autoencoders: Functional Behavior does not Guarantee Feature Reproducibility
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 14 Oct 2026]

Title:Diminishing Returns of Data in Sparse Autoencoders: Functional Behavior does not Guarantee Feature Reproducibility

View a PDF of the paper titled Diminishing Returns of Data in Sparse Autoencoders: Functional Behavior does not Guarantee Feature Reproducibility, by Sambit Ghosh and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are typically trained on hundreds of millions to billions of activation tokens, yet little work has tested whether this scale is necessary. We study how much activation data SAEs need by training four SAE architectures on three language models with budgets ranging from 5M tokens to a 500M-token reference. We measure two notions of convergence: functional behavior on standard evaluations and one-to-one reproducibility of learned features. Functional data requirements are strongly metric-dependent: reconstruction often approaches the full-data reference at substantially smaller budgets, whereas feature reproducibility continues to improve with data. For Gemma-2-2B BatchTopK, the fraction of strictly matched features rises from 2\% at 5M tokens to 29\% at 50M. Data selection also matters: random sampling better preserves the original activation distribution and generally favors reconstruction, whereas diversity-based sampling frequently improves AutoInterp. A theoretical analysis separates statistical consistency of subsampled training from the stronger identifiability and optimization conditions required for one-to-one feature recovery. Our results show that SAE training can often be made far more data-efficient when budgets are matched to the goal, and feature-level claims are backed by explicit reproducibility checks, paving the way toward cheaper and more reliable SAE research.

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.20680 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.20680v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.20680

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Sambit Ghosh [view email] [v1] Wed, 14 Oct 2026 16:12:42 UTC (108 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Diminishing Returns of Data in Sparse Autoencoders: Functional Behavior does not Guarantee Feature Reproducibility, by Sambit Ghosh and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs stat stat.ML

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.20680v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are typically trained on hundreds of millions to billions of activation tokens, yet little work has test…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.