Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

DexPolicy: Scheduled Exploration for Trajectory-Guided Dexterous Manipulation

Summary

arXiv:2610.00360v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) for dexterous manipulation must discover finger-object contacts and then control the object precisely; the action noise that serves the first goal can interfere with the second. In trajectory-guided settings such as ViViDex, where RL refine hand-object trajectories from human video, our baseline PPO runs end near their initial action noise after 5M steps, motivating explicit control of exploration scale. DexPolicy makes that scale an explicit function of training steps, annealing from broad to narrow exploration while holding loss, architecture, reward, and optimizer settings fixed. We study three policy-optimization settings: PPO, critic-free GRPO continuation, and a flow-parameterized PPO variant (FPO). Across f…

SourcearXiv RoboticsAuthor: Haoyu Wang, Siyuan Qian, Yanjun Li, Zeyu Zhang, Yandong Guo, Boxin Shi, Hao Tang
DexPolicy: Scheduled Exploration for Trajectory-Guided Dexterous Manipulation
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 30 Sep 2026]

Title:DexPolicy: Scheduled Exploration for Trajectory-Guided Dexterous Manipulation

View a PDF of the paper titled DexPolicy: Scheduled Exploration for Trajectory-Guided Dexterous Manipulation, by Haoyu Wang and 6 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Reinforcement learning (RL) for dexterous manipulation must discover finger-object contacts and then control the object precisely; the action noise that serves the first goal can interfere with the second. In trajectory-guided settings such as ViViDex, where RL refine hand-object trajectories from human video, our baseline PPO runs end near their initial action noise after 5M steps, motivating explicit control of exploration scale. DexPolicy makes that scale an explicit function of training steps, annealing from broad to narrow exploration while holding loss, architecture, reward, and optimizer settings fixed. We study three policy-optimization settings: PPO, critic-free GRPO continuation, and a flow-parameterized PPO variant (FPO). Across five YCB objects and three training seeds, mean deterministic Target success rises from 49.4% to 68.1% (FPO), 14.1% to 45.4% (GRPO), and 32.0% to 35.7% (PPO). On a RealMan RM75 arm with an Inspire/RH56 hand, 360 trials over three objects raise mean Target success from 25.0% to 85.0% (FPO), 10.0% to 63.3% (GRPO), and 8.3% to 43.3% (PPO), with one trained model per object-method condition. PPO component screening favors noise control over the tested optimizer contraction; the selected PPO schedule yields higher mean Target success than linear decay with the same endpoints on three tested objects. Training return, deterministic Target success, and tolerance to execution noise dissociate; schedules should therefore be judged by terminal task success under the intended execution conditions, per task and policy-optimization setting. Code: this https URL. Website: this https URL.

Subjects:

Robotics (cs.RO); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.00360 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2610.00360v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.00360

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Zeyu Zhang [view email] [v1] Wed, 30 Sep 2026 04:19:47 UTC (5,213 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled DexPolicy: Scheduled Exploration for Trajectory-Guided Dexterous Manipulation, by Haoyu Wang and 6 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.RO

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CV

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

ResearchersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.00360v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) for dexterous manipulation must discover finger-object contacts and then control the object precisely;…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.