AI 服務暫時不可用，以下為來源正文，待恢復後補全翻譯。
Comment: Devtools must be open source (exe.dev) Simon Willison’s Weblog Subscribe 3rd August 2026 Comment My comment on Devtools must be open source (exe.dev) — Hacker News One of the arguments for open source software for end-users has always been the freedom to examine and modify how that software works. The reality for most people - even expert programmers - has been that the freedom is more about being able to lean on other people to do that. Most people can't justify the time commitment needed to read and then modify the code for tools they use very often. I think LLMs have changed that equation in a way that makes the original dream much more feasible. Several times a day I'll prompt regular Claude chat to "Clone x/y from GitHub and tell me how Z works". Getting software to compile in order to start hacking on it used to be enough friction that I often wouldn't bother. Now I treat that as a zero time investment challenge: tell Codex or Claude Code to checkout and build X and then come back ten minutes later and see how it got on. I'm not habitually modifying the software I use yet, but I can see a path to that which didn't exist a year or so ago. Recent articles Stateless MCP has recaptured my interest (and inspired mcp-explorer and datasette-mcp) - 31st July 2026 OpenAI’s accidental cyberattack against Hugging Face is science fiction that happened - 22nd July 2026 A Fireside Chat with Cat and Thariq from the Claude Code team - 21st July 2026 This is a beat by Simon Willison, posted on 3rd August 2026. hacker-news 43 open-source 313 ai 2,162 generative-ai 1,914 llms 1,881 ai-assisted-programming 401 Monthly briefing Sponsor me for $10/month and get a curated email digest of the month's most important LLM developments. Pay me to send you less! Sponsor & subscribe Disclosures Colophon © 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026