Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

DeReAct: Decomposed Reasoning and Acting for Reliable AI Agents

Summary

arXiv:2610.02351v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: ReAct-based agents typically rely on a single LLM policy to propose actions, interact with the environment, and decide when a task is complete. This coupling makes action authorization and completion control difficult to enforce independently, allowing errors to propagate and unsupported completion claims to terminate execution. We introduce DeReAct, a modular agent architecture that externalizes two gating policies: a Critic that validates proposed actions before execution, and a Context Manager that reconstructs an environment-supported \textsc{State} and certifies task completion. Across GAIA and SWE-bench Verified, DeReAct improves Pass@1 most for weaker Brain models, with gains of 6.5--7.0 points for Qwen3-Coder-480B and 4.2--5.2 points…

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Ajay Vohra, Tao Chen, Neeti Narayan, Caron Zhang
DeReAct: Decomposed Reasoning and Acting for Reliable AI Agents
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 1 Oct 2026]

Title:DeReAct: Decomposed Reasoning and Acting for Reliable AI Agents

View a PDF of the paper titled DeReAct: Decomposed Reasoning and Acting for Reliable AI Agents, by Ajay Vohra and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:ReAct-based agents typically rely on a single LLM policy to propose actions, interact with the environment, and decide when a task is complete. This coupling makes action authorization and completion control difficult to enforce independently, allowing errors to propagate and unsupported completion claims to terminate execution. We introduce DeReAct, a modular agent architecture that externalizes two gating policies: a Critic that validates proposed actions before execution, and a Context Manager that reconstructs an environment-supported \textsc{State} and certifies task completion.

Across GAIA and SWE-bench Verified, DeReAct improves Pass@1 most for weaker Brain models, with gains of 6.5--7.0 points for Qwen3-Coder-480B and 4.2--5.2 points for Claude Sonnet~4.5; gains diminish as Brain capability increases. Trajectory and ablation analyses show that external gating is effective when targeted failures are sufficiently prevalent and the gating policy is itself sufficient. With Claude Opus~4.5, Pass@1 remains comparable to ReAct, while DeReAct produces more evidence-complete and constraint-satisfying trajectories, indicating that completion control can trade earlier termination for stronger grounding. Overall, DeReAct improves weaker agents while retaining grounding benefits as models strengthen.

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.02351 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.02351v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.02351

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Tao Chen [view email] [v1] Thu, 1 Oct 2026 18:25:07 UTC (407 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled DeReAct: Decomposed Reasoning and Acting for Reliable AI Agents, by Ajay Vohra and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.02351v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: ReAct-based agents typically rely on a single LLM policy to propose actions, interact with the environment, and decide when a task…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.