Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Data Quality over Capacity: Internalizing Documents into LoRA Adapters for Closed-Book QA

Summary

New research shows that for closed-book QA using LoRA adapters, data quality matters more than model capacity. A single curation pass boosted accuracy from 57.7% to 85.7% on a 15-document corpus, outperforming even retrieval-augmented baselines.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Joan Figuerola Hurtado
Data Quality over Capacity: Internalizing Documents into LoRA Adapters for Closed-Book QA
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 23 Jul 2026]

Title:Data Quality over Capacity: Internalizing Documents into LoRA Adapters for Closed-Book QA

View a PDF of the paper titled Data Quality over Capacity: Internalizing Documents into LoRA Adapters for Closed-Book QA, by Joan Figuerola Hurtado

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:We study baking documents directly into the weights of a 4-bit Gemma-4-e4b model via LoRA, so a system can answer questions about a corpus closed-book: no retrieval and no context-window budget. Across roughly 100 training runs from single documents to a 99-document corpus, we find that once adapter capacity is adequate, training-data quality is the dominant lever on closed-book accuracy, outweighing LoRA rank, learning rate, and two alternative architectures combined; capacity itself is a hard gate below which no data intervention helps. A single curation pass (shortening gold answers to canonical 1-6 word spans and dropping trivia) moved closed-book accuracy from 57.7% to 85.7% on a 15-document corpus, a larger jump than any architectural change. We confirm a capacity trend (rank must grow with corpus size) entangled with a coupling between rank and learning rate that we initially misdiagnosed. On a 15-document slice we add a real retrieval baseline: the internalized adapter (84.2% recall) beats a BM25-RAG pipeline with a base reader (58.9%) and even a realistic gold-chunk oracle (65.6%) at lower latency. We report the full arc, including three misdiagnoses, as a case study in debugging LLM training empirically.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.21861 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2607.21861v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.21861

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Joan Figuerola Hurtado [view email] [v1] Thu, 23 Jul 2026 23:14:59 UTC (12 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Data Quality over Capacity: Internalizing Documents into LoRA Adapters for Closed-Book QA, by Joan Figuerola Hurtado

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Data quality is the dominant factor for closed-book QA accuracy once adapter capacity is sufficient.
  • A simple curation pass (shortening answers and removing trivia) outperformed any architectural change.
  • The internalized adapter achieved 84.2% recall, beating BM25-RAG (58.9%) and even a gold-chunk oracle (65.6%).
  • Capacity must scale with corpus size, but is a hard gate below which no data improvement helps.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.