Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Cross-Prompt Reuse of Entity-Replacement Responses

Summary

The paper measures how entity-replacement responses transfer across English factual questions with fixed model weights, finding hidden reuse reduces no-change error but effects depend on model scale, format, and cohort, with advantages not replacement-specific.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Jinkun Chen, Xuemin Yu, Sijia Han, Vlado Keselj
Cross-Prompt Reuse of Entity-Replacement Responses
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 30 Oct 2026]

Title:Cross-Prompt Reuse of Entity-Replacement Responses

View a PDF of the paper titled Cross-Prompt Reuse of Entity-Replacement Responses, by Jinkun Chen and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:With model weights fixed, we measure how much of an entity-replacement response transfers between English factual questions, beyond whether answers change. We add the hidden-state change from two source questions to a target question about the same entity, comparing the predicted log-probability shift between two relations' published answers, given known answer prefixes, with the measured one. Hidden reuse injects the aligned change at 50% depth before the target's remaining layers; direct reuse adds source output-score changes. With other-relation sources, hidden reuse removes 45% and 49% of no-change error on 0.5-1B Qwen and Llama. Gemma-2-2B removes 22% and passes one of three comparisons in plain text without its default beginning-of-sequence (BOS) token. A later protocol restoring it yields 58-68%, passing every comparison on three cohorts. Larger checkpoints, chat format and new entities show replication and format- or cohort-dependent failures. On small plain-format checkpoints, other-relation hidden reuse mainly reproduces the shift both relations' questions share, without reliably lowering relation-selective error. With target-relation sources, hidden reuse's post hoc advantage over direct reuse is 0.2-0.9 nats outside chat format, unconfirmed and not replacement-specific. The same relation-neutral change at both questions' entity tokens lowers relation-selective error more than random or other-replacement changes, indicating receiving-question dependence.

Comments: 37 pages, including appendices

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2611.00352 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2611.00352v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.00352

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Jinkun Chen [view email] [v1] Fri, 30 Oct 2026 20:32:53 UTC (331 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Cross-Prompt Reuse of Entity-Replacement Responses, by Jinkun Chen and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-11

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Hidden reuse removes 45% and 49% of no-change error on 0.5-1B Qwen and Llama with other-relation sources.
  • Gemma-2-2B removes 22% without BOS token, and 58-68% with restored BOS, passing all comparisons on three cohorts.
  • On small plain-format checkpoints, hidden reuse mainly reproduces shared shift without reliably lowering relation-selective error.
  • Target-relation hidden reuse shows 0.2-0.9 nats post hoc advantage over direct reuse, unconfirmed and not replacement-specific.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.