Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

CroCo: Cross-Lingual Contrastive Preference Tuning on Self-Generations

Summary

CroCo extends contrastive preference tuning to multiple languages by leveraging an English reward model to rank self-generated responses across languages without language-specific annotations. Experiments on EuroLLM-9B and Aya-3B across 14 languages show improvements on both structured and open-ended tasks, with on-policy data being critical.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Mike Zhang, Ali Basirat, Desmond Elliott
CroCo: Cross-Lingual Contrastive Preference Tuning on Self-Generations
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.26293] CroCo: Cross-Lingual Contrastive Preference Tuning on Self-Generations

[Submitted on 25 May 2026]

Title:CroCo: Cross-Lingual Contrastive Preference Tuning on Self-Generations

View a PDF of the paper titled CroCo: Cross-Lingual Contrastive Preference Tuning on Self-Generations, by Mike Zhang and Ali Basirat and Desmond Elliott

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Prior work establishes that controlled contrastiveness between self-generated responses from large language models, set via reward scores, improves downstream preference tuning in English. We extend this method to multiple languages and evaluate two models across a total of 14 high and low-resource languages on a diverse set of tasks. Our central finding is that cross-lingual contrastive preference tuning on self-generations (CroCo) transfers without language-specific preference annotation. A reward model trained on English preferences (atop a multilingual base) produces useful within-language rankings across most languages, and pairing in either a monolingual or multilingual setting improves over each model on the majority of setups while preventing the catastrophic forgetting of supervised fine-tuning. We observe that the gains require on-policy data. Off-policy responses reduce the benefit and online preference optimization fails to improve over the offline variant. Specifically, on structured tasks, our method matches or exceeds the base in 6/7 languages for EuroLLM-9B and 4/7 settings for Aya-3B. On open-ended generation, both tuned models win against their respective base across 11 evaluated languages. Overall, we show promising directions for multilingual preference tuning.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.26293 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2605.26293v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.26293

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Mike Zhang [view email] [v1] Mon, 25 May 2026 19:30:45 UTC (1,367 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled CroCo: Cross-Lingual Contrastive Preference Tuning on Self-Generations, by Mike Zhang and Ali Basirat and Desmond Elliott

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Cross-lingual contrastive preference tuning (CroCo) transfers without language-specific preference annotations using an English reward model.
  • Validated on EuroLLM-9B and Aya-3B across 14 high- and low-resource languages.
  • Gains require on-policy data; offline variant outperforms online preference optimization.
  • Matches or exceeds baselines in 6/7 languages on structured tasks and wins in all 11 evaluated languages on open-ended generation.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.

CroCo: Cross-Lingual Contrastive Preference Tuning on Self-Generations | AI News Hub