Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

CoVLM-Bench: A Real-World Benchmark for Cooperative Driving Question Answering and Planning

Summary

arXiv:2609.35823v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) have made substantial progress in autonomous driving, but their success has primarily been studied in ego-centric scenes. Infrastructure-side observations provide views beyond the ego vehicle's field of view, yet conventional cooperative-driving systems typically transform them into geometric representations for downstream perception and planning. Directly incorporating these views into VLMs offers an opportunity to improve cooperative scene understanding and trajectory planning. However, question answering and trajectory planning have not been jointly evaluated on the same real-world vehicle-infrastructure scenes. We present CoVLM-Bench, a benchmark for cooperative driving question answering (CDQA) and cooperat…

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Kang Yang, Shuai Liu, Hang Li, Yance Fang, Deying Li, Yongcai Wang
CoVLM-Bench: A Real-World Benchmark for Cooperative Driving Question Answering and Planning
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 22 Sep 2026]

Title:CoVLM-Bench: A Real-World Benchmark for Cooperative Driving Question Answering and Planning

View a PDF of the paper titled CoVLM-Bench: A Real-World Benchmark for Cooperative Driving Question Answering and Planning, by Kang Yang and 5 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Vision-language models (VLMs) have made substantial progress in autonomous driving, but their success has primarily been studied in ego-centric scenes. Infrastructure-side observations provide views beyond the ego vehicle's field of view, yet conventional cooperative-driving systems typically transform them into geometric representations for downstream perception and planning. Directly incorporating these views into VLMs offers an opportunity to improve cooperative scene understanding and trajectory planning. However, question answering and trajectory planning have not been jointly evaluated on the same real-world vehicle-infrastructure scenes. We present CoVLM-Bench, a benchmark for cooperative driving question answering (CDQA) and cooperative planning (CP) on vehicle-infrastructure paired scenes. CoVLM-Bench provides scene-grounded CDQA annotations, three-part rationales as auxiliary supervision, and future trajectory targets derived from recorded ego motion. It contains 2,196 paired frames with 35,136 CDQA annotations, while CP predicts six waypoints over a three-second horizon. The annotations combine model-assisted drafting, record-based computation, and human verification. Built upon CoVLM-Bench, we introduce CoVLM-Drive, a unified VLM baseline that directly uses paired views for both CDQA and CP. Experiments show that CDQA adaptation improves answer accuracy and that CoVLM-Drive reaches a lower FDE than the compared V2X planners; QA initialization and rationale supervision each reduce planning error. Together, CoVLM-Bench and CoVLM-Drive support the training and comparison of VLMs for cooperative scene understanding and planning.

Comments: 32 pages, 11 figures, 13 tables. Main text 9 pages; appendices from page 17

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.35823 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2609.35823v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.35823

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Kang Yang [view email] [v1] Tue, 22 Sep 2026 10:40:16 UTC (7,633 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled CoVLM-Bench: A Real-World Benchmark for Cooperative Driving Question Answering and Planning, by Kang Yang and 5 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.35823v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) have made substantial progress in autonomous driving, but their success has primarily been studied in…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.