Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Counterfactual Neighborhood Risk Fields: Evidence-Grounded Selective Safety for Vision-Language Models

Summary

arXiv:2610.20679v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Representation-based safety defenses for vision-language models (VLMs) often learn to separate harmful from benign inputs, but separation alone does not establish what a risk score means or when it should be trusted. We introduce Counterfactual Neighborhood Risk Fields (CNRF), an evidence-grounded framework for selective VLM safety. CNRF constructs context-matched benign-harmful counterfactual pairs, uses their representation differences as capability-related risk directions, and estimates neighborhood support separately from risk. This separation prevents unfamiliarity from being conflated with harmfulness and enables selective intervention rather than blanket rejection. A victim-adaptive interface accommodates different safety observations…

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Tianshi Wang, Jingsong Wang, Fengling Li, Jingjing Li, Xin Li, Lei Zhu
Counterfactual Neighborhood Risk Fields: Evidence-Grounded Selective Safety for Vision-Language Models
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 14 Oct 2026]

Title:Counterfactual Neighborhood Risk Fields: Evidence-Grounded Selective Safety for Vision-Language Models

View a PDF of the paper titled Counterfactual Neighborhood Risk Fields: Evidence-Grounded Selective Safety for Vision-Language Models, by Tianshi Wang and 5 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Representation-based safety defenses for vision-language models (VLMs) often learn to separate harmful from benign inputs, but separation alone does not establish what a risk score means or when it should be trusted. We introduce Counterfactual Neighborhood Risk Fields (CNRF), an evidence-grounded framework for selective VLM safety. CNRF constructs context-matched benign-harmful counterfactual pairs, uses their representation differences as capability-related risk directions, and estimates neighborhood support separately from risk. This separation prevents unfamiliarity from being conflated with harmfulness and enables selective intervention rather than blanket rejection. A victim-adaptive interface accommodates different safety observations across VLM architectures and routes selected requests for same-victim response review, which either releases acceptable candidates or produces constrained alternatives with reduced harmful capability. Across three VLMs and five multimodal jailbreak families, CNRF achieves 86.06-89.30% macro defense success rate while retaining substantial benign-task utility. Controlled experiments further show that query-matched references and preserved context-direction correspondence materially improve risk ranking in the low-false-positive regime. CNRF thus reframes representation-based VLM safety from learning harmfulness boundaries to constructing applicable evidence for selective risk decisions.

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Multimedia (cs.MM)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.20679 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.20679v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.20679

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Jingsong Wang [view email] [v1] Wed, 14 Oct 2026 16:08:14 UTC (2,603 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Counterfactual Neighborhood Risk Fields: Evidence-Grounded Selective Safety for Vision-Language Models, by Tianshi Wang and 5 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CR cs.MM

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.20679v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Representation-based safety defenses for vision-language models (VLMs) often learn to separate harmful from benign inputs, but sepa…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.