跳到主要内容
AI News HubLIVE
来源内容 · 翻译待补全2 分钟阅读

待翻译:CoTS: Competitive Token Selection for Latent Reasoning in Large Language Models

文章摘要

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源摘要,待恢复后补全翻译:arXiv:2610.20642v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent latent reasoning methods move beyond discrete Chain-of-Thought (CoT) by replacing sampled tokens with continuous soft embeddings or hidden states, enabling richer intermediate representations and preserving alternative reasoning paths. However, the need for latent reasoning varies across decoding steps: confident predictions favor discrete commitment, whereas ambiguous steps benefit from preserving multiple plausible alternatives. Existing approaches typically handle this variation through either global soft activation or hard switching based on uncertainty thresholds, treating latent intervention as an all-or-nothing decision rather than continuously adapting its strength. To address this limitation, we pr…

来源arXiv Computational Linguistics作者: Jie Yu, Yuxi Sun, Zhaoxu Li, Chunxiao Liu, Xudong Jiang
待翻译:CoTS: Competitive Token Selection for Latent Reasoning in Large Language Models
报告错误

纠错通道尚未开通,可先复制下方文章信息留存。

查看更正说明
直接读正文

AI 服务暂时不可用,以下为来源正文,待恢复后补全翻译。

[Submitted on 8 Oct 2026] Title:CoTS: Competitive Token Selection for Latent Reasoning in Large Language Models View a PDF of the paper titled CoTS: Competitive Token Selection for Latent Reasoning in Large Language Models, by Jie Yu and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Recent latent reasoning methods move beyond discrete Chain-of-Thought (CoT) by replacing sampled tokens with continuous soft embeddings or hidden states, enabling richer intermediate representations and preserving alternative reasoning paths. However, the need for latent reasoning varies across decoding steps: confident predictions favor discrete commitment, whereas ambiguous steps benefit from preserving multiple plausible alternatives. Existing approaches typically handle this variation through either global soft activation or hard switching based on uncertainty thresholds, treating latent intervention as an all-or-nothing decision rather than continuously adapting its strength. To address this limitation, we propose Competitive Token Selection (CoTS), a training-free framework that reframes latent intervention from binary mode selection into continuous allocation at the token level. CoTS uses the probability competition between the two most likely candidates to dynamically balance discrete commitment and soft exploration at each reasoning step. The second candidate represents the strongest alternative to the model's preferred continuation, so the separation between the two directly reflects the stability of the current discrete choice. When one candidate clearly dominates, CoTS keeps the representation close to the sampled discrete token to preserve a stable reasoning trajectory; as the competition strengthens, it increases the contribution of the soft representation to retain plausible alternatives. This competition-based allocation requires neither manually tuned switching thresholds nor mixing coefficients, and introduces no additional forward passes. Experiments across six reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that CoTS consistently outperforms standard CoT and state-of-the-art training-free latent reasoning methods. Our code is available at this https URL. Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2610.20642 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2610.20642v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.20642 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Jie Yu [view email] [v1] Thu, 8 Oct 2026 02:47:16 UTC (117 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled CoTS: Competitive Token Selection for Latent Reasoning in Large Language Models, by Jie Yu and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-10 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展开要点与分析

文章情报

工程师进阶

要点

  • AI 服务暂时不可用,系统已先保留来源内容与降级元数据。
  • arXiv:2610.20642v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent latent reasoning methods move beyond discrete Chain-of-Thought (CoT) by replacing sampled tokens with continuous soft embedd…

要点与分析由自动化流程生成,可能有误,请结合原始来源核实。