Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

CoTS: Competitive Token Selection for Latent Reasoning in Large Language Models

Summary

arXiv:2610.20642v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent latent reasoning methods move beyond discrete Chain-of-Thought (CoT) by replacing sampled tokens with continuous soft embeddings or hidden states, enabling richer intermediate representations and preserving alternative reasoning paths. However, the need for latent reasoning varies across decoding steps: confident predictions favor discrete commitment, whereas ambiguous steps benefit from preserving multiple plausible alternatives. Existing approaches typically handle this variation through either global soft activation or hard switching based on uncertainty thresholds, treating latent intervention as an all-or-nothing decision rather than continuously adapting its strength. To address this limitation, we propose Competitive Token Sele…

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Jie Yu, Yuxi Sun, Zhaoxu Li, Chunxiao Liu, Xudong Jiang
CoTS: Competitive Token Selection for Latent Reasoning in Large Language Models
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 8 Oct 2026]

Title:CoTS: Competitive Token Selection for Latent Reasoning in Large Language Models

View a PDF of the paper titled CoTS: Competitive Token Selection for Latent Reasoning in Large Language Models, by Jie Yu and 4 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Recent latent reasoning methods move beyond discrete Chain-of-Thought (CoT) by replacing sampled tokens with continuous soft embeddings or hidden states, enabling richer intermediate representations and preserving alternative reasoning paths. However, the need for latent reasoning varies across decoding steps: confident predictions favor discrete commitment, whereas ambiguous steps benefit from preserving multiple plausible alternatives. Existing approaches typically handle this variation through either global soft activation or hard switching based on uncertainty thresholds, treating latent intervention as an all-or-nothing decision rather than continuously adapting its strength. To address this limitation, we propose Competitive Token Selection (CoTS), a training-free framework that reframes latent intervention from binary mode selection into continuous allocation at the token level. CoTS uses the probability competition between the two most likely candidates to dynamically balance discrete commitment and soft exploration at each reasoning step. The second candidate represents the strongest alternative to the model's preferred continuation, so the separation between the two directly reflects the stability of the current discrete choice. When one candidate clearly dominates, CoTS keeps the representation close to the sampled discrete token to preserve a stable reasoning trajectory; as the competition strengthens, it increases the contribution of the soft representation to retain plausible alternatives. This competition-based allocation requires neither manually tuned switching thresholds nor mixing coefficients, and introduces no additional forward passes. Experiments across six reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that CoTS consistently outperforms standard CoT and state-of-the-art training-free latent reasoning methods. Our code is available at this https URL.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.20642 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.20642v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.20642

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Jie Yu [view email] [v1] Thu, 8 Oct 2026 02:47:16 UTC (117 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled CoTS: Competitive Token Selection for Latent Reasoning in Large Language Models, by Jie Yu and 4 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.20642v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent latent reasoning methods move beyond discrete Chain-of-Thought (CoT) by replacing sampled tokens with continuous soft embedd…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.