Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Correcting Learning-based Perception for Safety

Summary

arXiv:2609.22108v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Learning-enabled perception is important in many autonomous systems. Unlike traditional sensors, the boundary where ML perception does or does not work is poorly characterized. Incorrect perception can lead to unsafe or overtly conservative downstream control actions. In this paper, we propose a two-step strategy for correcting ML-based state estimation. First, an offline computation is used to characterize the uncertainties resulting from the ML module's state estimation, using preimages of perception contracts. Second, at runtime, a risk heuristic is used to choose particular states from the uncertain estimates to drive the control decisions. We perform extensive simulation-based evaluation of this runtime perception correction strategy on…

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Yan Miao, Hussein Darir, Sayan Mitra
Correcting Learning-based Perception for Safety
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 16 Aug 2026]

Title:Correcting Learning-based Perception for Safety

View a PDF of the paper titled Correcting Learning-based Perception for Safety, by Yan Miao and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Learning-enabled perception is important in many autonomous systems. Unlike traditional sensors, the boundary where ML perception does or does not work is poorly characterized. Incorrect perception can lead to unsafe or overtly conservative downstream control actions. In this paper, we propose a two-step strategy for correcting ML-based state estimation. First, an offline computation is used to characterize the uncertainties resulting from the ML module's state estimation, using preimages of perception contracts. Second, at runtime, a risk heuristic is used to choose particular states from the uncertain estimates to drive the control decisions. We perform extensive simulation-based evaluation of this runtime perception correction strategy on different vision-based adaptive cruise controllers (ACC modules), in different weather conditions, and road scenarios. Out of 45 ACC scenarios where the original perception-based control system using Yolo and LaneNet led to safety violations, in 73% of the scenarios, our runtime perception correction preserved safety; our method wouldn't be able to recover 27% of the scenarios where the construction of the preimages of perception contracts is not fully conformant. Further, our runtime perception correction strategy is not overly conservative---on the average only a 2.8% increase in completion time is experienced in the corrected scenarios, with mild interventions.

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Robotics (cs.RO)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.22108 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.22108v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22108

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Yan Miao [view email] [v1] Sun, 16 Aug 2026 16:59:45 UTC (4,620 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Correcting Learning-based Perception for Safety, by Yan Miao and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CV cs.RO

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.22108v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Learning-enabled perception is important in many autonomous systems. Unlike traditional sensors, the boundary where ML perception d…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.