Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

ContextAdapt: Evaluating Contextual Adaptation and Value Alignment in LLMs

Summary

arXiv:2609.38260v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Values such as honesty, autonomy, and confidentiality are often regarded as general principles underpinning AI alignment. However, what it means to act in accordance with these values can depend on the context in which a decision is made. In this paper, we ask whether large language models (LLMs) appropriately adapt the application of a value across professional settings, while remaining consistent when contextual changes do not alter the relevant professional norm. To study this, we introduce ContextAdapt, an evaluation framework covering honesty, autonomy, and confidentiality across medicine, law, finance, and national security. Drawing on primary-source professional and regulatory documents, we construct a value x domain framework and use…

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Olivia Macmillan-Scott, Mirco Musolesi
ContextAdapt: Evaluating Contextual Adaptation and Value Alignment in LLMs
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 29 Sep 2026]

Title:ContextAdapt: Evaluating Contextual Adaptation and Value Alignment in LLMs

View a PDF of the paper titled ContextAdapt: Evaluating Contextual Adaptation and Value Alignment in LLMs, by Olivia Macmillan-Scott and Mirco Musolesi

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Values such as honesty, autonomy, and confidentiality are often regarded as general principles underpinning AI alignment. However, what it means to act in accordance with these values can depend on the context in which a decision is made. In this paper, we ask whether large language models (LLMs) appropriately adapt the application of a value across professional settings, while remaining consistent when contextual changes do not alter the relevant professional norm. To study this, we introduce ContextAdapt, an evaluation framework covering honesty, autonomy, and confidentiality across medicine, law, finance, and national security. Drawing on primary-source professional and regulatory documents, we construct a value x domain framework and use this to develop scenarios testing both default professional rules and recognised exceptions. We evaluate 12 LLMs on both the actions they recommend and the justifications they provide. In our main experiment, models achieve 95.6% mean appropriateness, although the use of the correct domain-specific justification varies substantially across models, from 25.6% to 76.9%. In a separate factorial experiment, explicitly naming the professional domain and changing the role of the model have limited effect on behaviour. Varying stakes, however, reveals severe but localised failures: in some cases, models alter their responses even though the underlying professional obligation remains unchanged. In particular, perceived severity appears to act as a cue for disclosure across both honesty and confidentiality scenarios. These results show that evaluating value alignment requires us to consider not only whether models follow abstract principles, but whether they apply them appropriately across different contexts.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.38260 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.38260v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.38260

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Olivia Macmillan-Scott [view email] [v1] Tue, 29 Sep 2026 11:52:52 UTC (1,920 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled ContextAdapt: Evaluating Contextual Adaptation and Value Alignment in LLMs, by Olivia Macmillan-Scott and Mirco Musolesi

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.38260v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Values such as honesty, autonomy, and confidentiality are often regarded as general principles underpinning AI alignment. However,…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.