Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Conformal Factuality Control for Multi-Hop Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Summary

arXiv:2609.38222v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can ground large language models in external evidence, but retrieved context does not guarantee that generated claims are factually supported. This problem is especially relevant in multi-hop RAG, where retrieval and reasoning proceed through multiple dependent stages. We study whether claim-level conformal factuality control, previously developed for RAG, remains effective in this setting. We apply split-conformal claim filtering to multi-hop RAG and evaluate it on HotpotQA, Natural Questions, and TriviaQA using Llama 3.1 8B and GPT-4o-mini, together with a single-hop reference experiment. Across all six multi-hop model-dataset configurations, increasingly stringent conformal targets consistently increas…

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Muhammad Aimal Rehman, Chi-Kuang Yeh
Conformal Factuality Control for Multi-Hop Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 27 Sep 2026]

Title:Conformal Factuality Control for Multi-Hop Retrieval-Augmented Generation

View a PDF of the paper titled Conformal Factuality Control for Multi-Hop Retrieval-Augmented Generation, by Muhammad Aimal Rehman and Chi-Kuang Yeh

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can ground large language models in external evidence, but retrieved context does not guarantee that generated claims are factually supported. This problem is especially relevant in multi-hop RAG, where retrieval and reasoning proceed through multiple dependent stages. We study whether claim-level conformal factuality control, previously developed for RAG, remains effective in this setting. We apply split-conformal claim filtering to multi-hop RAG and evaluate it on HotpotQA, Natural Questions, and TriviaQA using Llama 3.1 8B and GPT-4o-mini, together with a single-hop reference experiment. Across all six multi-hop model-dataset configurations, increasingly stringent conformal targets consistently increase the fraction of responses whose retained claims are fully supported. At the 95% target, this rate ranges from 95.80% to 97.20%, compared with 55.60%-76.03% without filtering. However, the improvement is strongly selective: only 4.41%-31.09% of generated claims are retained and 9.70%-51.40% of responses remain non-empty at the 95% target. These results show that conformal factuality extends to multi-hop RAG, while demonstrating that nominal reliability must be interpreted jointly with claim retention and abstention.

Comments: 15 pages, 2 figures. Code available at this https URL

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.38222 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.38222v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.38222

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Muhammad Aimal Rehman [view email] [v1] Sun, 27 Sep 2026 23:55:03 UTC (670 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Conformal Factuality Control for Multi-Hop Retrieval-Augmented Generation, by Muhammad Aimal Rehman and Chi-Kuang Yeh

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs cs.LG stat stat.ML

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.38222v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can ground large language models in external evidence, but retrieved context does not guarante…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.