Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Confidence-Controlled XAI Auditing for Pedestrian Detection under Domain Shift

Summary

arXiv:2610.02364v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Explainability is increasingly required for perception models in intelligent vehicles, yet whether explanations remain faithful under driving domain shift is still poorly understood. This work audits post-hoc explanations of a fixed YOLOv8s pedestrian detector across PIE and JAAD using ROI-based D-Deletion, frozen confidence terciles, rank-based tests, bootstrap intervals, and Holm correction. The audit shows that deletion-based faithfulness is strongly coupled to detection strength at explanation time, with Spearman correlations between 0.70 and 0.82 for D-RISE, making naive confidence-stratified comparisons unreliable. After controlling for detection strength within fixed f0 bins, D-RISE faithfulness remains domain-dependent in the central…

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Ruben Dario Florez-Zela
Confidence-Controlled XAI Auditing for Pedestrian Detection under Domain Shift
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 1 Oct 2026]

Title:Confidence-Controlled XAI Auditing for Pedestrian Detection under Domain Shift

View a PDF of the paper titled Confidence-Controlled XAI Auditing for Pedestrian Detection under Domain Shift, by Ruben Dario Florez-Zela

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Explainability is increasingly required for perception models in intelligent vehicles, yet whether explanations remain faithful under driving domain shift is still poorly understood. This work audits post-hoc explanations of a fixed YOLOv8s pedestrian detector across PIE and JAAD using ROI-based D-Deletion, frozen confidence terciles, rank-based tests, bootstrap intervals, and Holm correction. The audit shows that deletion-based faithfulness is strongly coupled to detection strength at explanation time, with Spearman correlations between 0.70 and 0.82 for D-RISE, making naive confidence-stratified comparisons unreliable. After controlling for detection strength within fixed f0 bins, D-RISE faithfulness remains domain-dependent in the central f0 range, with PIE showing higher D-Deletion than JAAD and Holm-adjusted significance. A non-perturbative EigenCAM baseline is less faithful than D-RISE but also exhibits score coupling, suggesting that the effect is not specific to D-RISE and is related to the deletion-based evaluation setup. These results motivate confidence-controlled XAI audits for safety-critical perception under domain shift.

Comments: Accepted at the 2026 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety (ICVES 2026). 6 pages, 4 figures

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.02364 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2610.02364v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.02364

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Ruben Dario Florez-Zela [view email] [v1] Thu, 1 Oct 2026 18:39:57 UTC (1,171 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Confidence-Controlled XAI Auditing for Pedestrian Detection under Domain Shift, by Ruben Dario Florez-Zela

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.02364v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Explainability is increasingly required for perception models in intelligent vehicles, yet whether explanations remain faithful und…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.