Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Component and Dimension Sparsity in Transformer Refusal Mechanisms

Summary

arXiv:2610.06903v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Activation steering manipulates large language model behavior by intervening on internal activations, but the mechanistic basis of these interventions remains poorly understood. We decompose refusal steering into component-level interventions across four open-weight models, identifying the sparse subsets of attention and MLP components whose steering suffices to reproduce the full behavioral effect. We find that refusal directions concentrate in sparse component mechanisms comprising 28--48\% of upstream components, retaining 88--101\% of steering effectiveness. Within these mechanisms, effective steering further concentrates in approximately 50\% of residual stream dimensions, retaining 85--98\% of the component-mechanism baseline, consiste…

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Vincent Siu, Glenn Grant-Richards, Vlad Pavlovich, Yizhou Sun, Dawn Song, Chenguang Wang
Component and Dimension Sparsity in Transformer Refusal Mechanisms
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 30 Sep 2026]

Title:Component and Dimension Sparsity in Transformer Refusal Mechanisms

View a PDF of the paper titled Component and Dimension Sparsity in Transformer Refusal Mechanisms, by Vincent Siu and 5 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Activation steering manipulates large language model behavior by intervening on internal activations, but the mechanistic basis of these interventions remains poorly understood. We decompose refusal steering into component-level interventions across four open-weight models, identifying the sparse subsets of attention and MLP components whose steering suffices to reproduce the full behavioral effect. We find that refusal directions concentrate in sparse component mechanisms comprising 28--48\% of upstream components, retaining 88--101\% of steering effectiveness. Within these mechanisms, effective steering further concentrates in approximately 50\% of residual stream dimensions, retaining 85--98\% of the component-mechanism baseline, consistent with a privileged basis structure. Sparsity thus operates at two levels: which components are steered, and which dimensions within those components carry the signal. Together these findings show that refusal is not diffusely encoded across a transformer but assembled by a structured, identifiable mechanism, providing a foundation for mechanistic understanding of how refusal behaviors are represented and steered. To facilitate reproducibility, we release all code and raw experimental results in this https URL.

Comments: Accepted to COLM 2026

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.06903 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.06903v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.06903

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Vincent Siu [view email] [v1] Wed, 30 Sep 2026 23:32:40 UTC (5,599 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Component and Dimension Sparsity in Transformer Refusal Mechanisms, by Vincent Siu and 5 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.06903v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Activation steering manipulates large language model behavior by intervening on internal activations, but the mechanistic basis of…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.