Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Comedic Fool's Gold: Reward Exploits and Countermeasures in Conversational Humor

Summary

arXiv:2610.00197v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We investigate automated rewards for training language models in conversational humor, focusing on reward exploits and countermeasures. Two approaches aim to capture understandable surprise and predicted audience amusement. Controlled tests show that an embedding-based surprise reward accepts word-shuffled replies as readily as witty ones. A fluency filter detects the shuffles, but the combined reward also rejects some witty replies and fails further validation. An audience model's predicted laughter is instead vulnerable to laughter cues in either speaker's messages. Normalizing these cues across speakers blocks the covered attacks, although unmatched expressions remain exploitable. Three reinforcement-learning runs evaluate training with s…

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Sam Larson
Comedic Fool's Gold: Reward Exploits and Countermeasures in Conversational Humor
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 18 Sep 2026]

Title:Comedic Fool's Gold: Reward Exploits and Countermeasures in Conversational Humor

View a PDF of the paper titled Comedic Fool's Gold: Reward Exploits and Countermeasures in Conversational Humor, by Sam Larson

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:We investigate automated rewards for training language models in conversational humor, focusing on reward exploits and countermeasures. Two approaches aim to capture understandable surprise and predicted audience amusement. Controlled tests show that an embedding-based surprise reward accepts word-shuffled replies as readily as witty ones. A fluency filter detects the shuffles, but the combined reward also rejects some witty replies and fails further validation. An audience model's predicted laughter is instead vulnerable to laughter cues in either speaker's messages. Normalizing these cues across speakers blocks the covered attacks, although unmatched expressions remain exploitable. Three reinforcement-learning runs evaluate training with successive reward revisions. The final run improves the combined evaluation score by 0.0903 and reduces zero-score sessions by 40%, but its humor-specific improvement remains below our preregistered target. These findings illustrate a broader challenge for automated reward design: countermeasures must block exploitable shortcuts while preserving the behavior the reward was intended to encourage.

Comments: 11 pages, 3 figures, 4 tables

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.00197 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.00197v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.00197

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Samuel Larson [view email] [v1] Fri, 18 Sep 2026 20:14:09 UTC (56 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Comedic Fool's Gold: Reward Exploits and Countermeasures in Conversational Humor, by Sam Larson

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CL cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.00197v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We investigate automated rewards for training language models in conversational humor, focusing on reward exploits and countermeasu…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.