AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

CLIR-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal Question Answering over Irregular Clinical Time Series

CLIR-Bench is a benchmark for evaluating models on question answering over irregular clinical time series. It is constructed from de-identified ICU records using a principled four-stage pipeline, comprising 6,600 QA instances covering 11 clinical variables, organized into four capability dimensions and 11 tasks. Experiments reveal that current generalist models struggle to retrieve and reason over sparse clinical evidence, highlighting the need for stronger irregular time-series reasoning methods.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Frank Nie, Ethan B. Liu, Yuan Zhu, Loe Yan, Wei Fan, Jindong Han

-->

[Submitted on 10 Jul 2026]

Title:CLIR-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal Question Answering over Irregular Clinical Time Series

View a PDF of the paper titled CLIR-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal Question Answering over Irregular Clinical Time Series, by Frank Nie and 5 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Clinical time series are central to patient monitoring, risk assessment, and clinical decision support. However, they are often sparse, irregularly sampled, and asynchronous, making it difficult for models to identify the temporal evidence required for clinical Question Answering (QA). Existing benchmarks primarily focus on regularly sampled time-series QA or medical QA over static data, and therefore rarely assess whether models can faithfully ground their answers in irregular temporal observations. To fill this gap, we introduce CLIR-Bench, a benchmark for irregular clinical time series QA constructed from de-identified ICU records through a principled four-stage pipeline. CLIR-Bench contains 6,600 QA instances spanning 11 clinical variables, organized into four capability dimensions and 11 tasks. Each question is linked to explicit temporal evidence and task-specific answer derivation rules, enabling evaluation of both answer accuracy and evidence use. Experiments show that existing generalist models struggle to retrieve and reason over sparse clinical evidence, highlighting the need for stronger irregular time-series reasoning methods. Our code and data are available at this https URL.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.09880 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2607.09880v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.09880

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Jindong Han [view email] [v1] Fri, 10 Jul 2026 18:13:54 UTC (7,883 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled CLIR-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal Question Answering over Irregular Clinical Time Series, by Frank Nie and 5 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)