Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Clinician-Grounded Quality Assurance for AI-Assisted Psychiatric Intake

Summary

arXiv:2609.21149v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Before patients can use AI-assisted psychiatric intake systems, health systems need practical ways to routinely evaluate these tools against their clinical standards for quality assurance. Because clinicians may use different intake styles, evaluation for this task must (1) support comparison across interviewing approaches, (2) minimize clinician burden, and (3) measure clinically relevant performance for health systems deploying these technologies. We present a clinician-grounded evaluation platform built around a memory-augmented patient simulator for open-ended AI interviewing, InterviewPlayground. We created interactive patients using InterviewPlayground with our expert-authored vignettes, constructed a simulated intake platform for the…

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: King Shi, Amanda Li, Jonathan Ivey, Synthia Qia Wang, Guan Gui, Hyunseo Kim, Peter Zandi, Jason Straub, Jacob Taylor, Ananya Joshi
Clinician-Grounded Quality Assurance for AI-Assisted Psychiatric Intake
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 17 Sep 2026]

Title:Clinician-Grounded Quality Assurance for AI-Assisted Psychiatric Intake

View a PDF of the paper titled Clinician-Grounded Quality Assurance for AI-Assisted Psychiatric Intake, by King Shi and 9 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Before patients can use AI-assisted psychiatric intake systems, health systems need practical ways to routinely evaluate these tools against their clinical standards for quality assurance. Because clinicians may use different intake styles, evaluation for this task must (1) support comparison across interviewing approaches, (2) minimize clinician burden, and (3) measure clinically relevant performance for health systems deploying these technologies. We present a clinician-grounded evaluation platform built around a memory-augmented patient simulator for open-ended AI interviewing, InterviewPlayground. We created interactive patients using InterviewPlayground with our expert-authored vignettes, constructed a simulated intake platform for the interviews, and designed evaluation modalities relevant to intake. In a pilot of 6 clinicians in a 25-minute assessment compared to a GPT-based LLM intake interviewer, the LLM recovered more of the clinically relevant items embedded in the patient vignettes (88.0% vs. 38.9%), but made more clinical inferences not based on the interview (56.8% vs. 27.8%), and characterized identified safety concerns less often (33.3% vs. 66.7%), setting the stage for deployed quality assurance for this task.

Comments: 7 pages, 3 figures, submitted to IAAI'27

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.21149 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2609.21149v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.21149

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: King Shi [view email] [v1] Thu, 17 Sep 2026 23:29:21 UTC (622 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Clinician-Grounded Quality Assurance for AI-Assisted Psychiatric Intake, by King Shi and 9 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CL

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.21149v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Before patients can use AI-assisted psychiatric intake systems, health systems need practical ways to routinely evaluate these tool…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.