Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Clinical Reasoning Under a Partially Observed Objective in Cone Beam CT Report Generation

Summary

arXiv:2609.13238v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Maxillofacial report generation from cone beam computed tomography is scored here by a composite objective placing 80% of its weight on a large language model judgement of factual entailment and 20% on lexical overlap, of which only the lexical fifth is visible during development. The grader's BLEU-4 and METEOR routines are reproduced in pure Python and match the reference to machine precision, and an offline entailment surrogate, which tells a report written for one patient from one written for another at an area under the curve of 0.987, makes the composite objective cheap enough to optimise directly. Over the 622-case public release, a report selected against the visible lexical ranking scores 0.2909, whereas one selected against the comp…

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Ajo Babu George, Govind Arun, Sidharth N Krishna, Uma Ranjan
Clinical Reasoning Under a Partially Observed Objective in Cone Beam CT Report Generation
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 2 Sep 2026]

Title:Clinical Reasoning Under a Partially Observed Objective in Cone Beam CT Report Generation

View a PDF of the paper titled Clinical Reasoning Under a Partially Observed Objective in Cone Beam CT Report Generation, by Ajo Babu George and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Maxillofacial report generation from cone beam computed tomography is scored here by a composite objective placing 80% of its weight on a large language model judgement of factual entailment and 20% on lexical overlap, of which only the lexical fifth is visible during development. The grader's BLEU-4 and METEOR routines are reproduced in pure Python and match the reference to machine precision, and an offline entailment surrogate, which tells a report written for one patient from one written for another at an area under the curve of 0.987, makes the composite objective cheap enough to optimise directly. Over the 622-case public release, a report selected against the visible lexical ranking scores 0.2909, whereas one selected against the composite objective scores 0.4122, because pursuing n-gram overlap drives entailment precision from 0.522 down to 0.266. A 29 million parameter encoder fine-tuned on the release reaches a prevalence-weighted out-of-fold area under the curve of 0.486 over 985 statements, indistinguishable from the corpus prior, while nine numbers read from the image header reach 0.945 for mandible coverage and 0.872 for condyle coverage, and acquisition centre alone predicts sentence choice at 0.718 against 0.663 for the image-derived model, identifying dictation convention rather than anatomy as the quantity the lexical metrics reward. The delivered system emits eight unconditional statements and five gated on header geometry under polarity, laterality and tooth-level consistency constraints, and reaches METEOR 0.3542 over 50 held-out cases from an unseen centre. The dataset and code are available at this https URL

Comments: 11 pages, 3 figures. ODIN 2026 CBCT report generation challenge system. Code: this https URL

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.13238 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.13238v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.13238

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Govind A [view email] [v1] Wed, 2 Sep 2026 15:06:06 UTC (2,263 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Clinical Reasoning Under a Partially Observed Objective in Cone Beam CT Report Generation, by Ajo Babu George and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CV

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.13238v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Maxillofacial report generation from cone beam computed tomography is scored here by a composite objective placing 80% of its weigh…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.